Re: [Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

2006-09-21 Thread Friedrich Leisch
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:07:26 -0700, Seth Falcon (SF) wrote: Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2006/9/20, Seth Falcon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..not to mention TeX comments inside Sexpr (e.g. %*%...). Skipping lines with % as

Re: [Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

2006-09-21 Thread Marc Schwartz (via MN)
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 16:40 +0200, Friedrich Leisch wrote: On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:07:26 -0700, Seth Falcon (SF) wrote: Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2006/9/20, Seth Falcon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..not to mention TeX

Re: [Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

2006-09-20 Thread Friedrich Leisch
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:39 -0500, Marc Schwartz (MS) wrote: Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document}

Re: [Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

2006-09-20 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Friedrich Leisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:39 -0500, Marc Schwartz (MS) wrote: Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file:

Re: [Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

2006-09-20 Thread Marc Schwartz (via MN)
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:20 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: Friedrich Leisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:39 -0500, Marc Schwartz (MS) wrote: Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version

Re: [Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

2006-09-20 Thread Seth Falcon
Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..not to mention TeX comments inside Sexpr (e.g. %*%...). Skipping lines with % as the first character might be a viable compromise though. +1. You could probably ignore any lines where the first non-whitespace char is '%'. But if that seems to

Re: [Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

2006-09-20 Thread Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo
2006/9/20, Seth Falcon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..not to mention TeX comments inside Sexpr (e.g. %*%...). Skipping lines with % as the first character might be a viable compromise though. +1. You could probably ignore any lines where the first

Re: [Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

2006-09-20 Thread Seth Falcon
Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2006/9/20, Seth Falcon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..not to mention TeX comments inside Sexpr (e.g. %*%...). Skipping lines with % as the first character might be a viable compromise though. +1. You could

[Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

2006-09-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document} This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 +