I find it a bit peculiar that a package skeleton created with a utils
function package.skeleton() fails subsequent R CMD check. I do
understand that the function is intended to produce only a skeleton that
should be edited by the package author. I think that it would be
justified to say that the
Jari == Jari Oksanen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:58:10 +0300 writes:
Jari I find it a bit peculiar that a package skeleton created with a utils
Jari function package.skeleton() fails subsequent R CMD check. I do
Jari understand that the function is intended to
One thing I forgot to add:
Did you try to include
- data frames
- other data
- S3 generics and methods
- S4 generics and methods
in the objects you gave to package.skeleton() ?
If we want to change the prompt*() functions such that
package.skeleton() produces a package that
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 11:23 +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
Since you didn't use text/plain as content type, your
attachment didn't make it to the list anyway,
Yeah, I noticed.
and you have a
second chance:
Please use a diff -u against
