Thanks for your help. I had two concerns about using as: that it would
impose some overhead, and that it would require me to code an explicit
conversion function. I see now that the latter is not true; I don't
know if the overhead makes much difference.
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 13:00 -0800, Martin
I missed the earlier round of this discussion and only am commenting now
to say that this doesn't seem weird at all, if I understand what you're
trying to do.
Martin's basic suggestion,
v - callGeneric(e1, as(e2, A))
seems the simplest solution.
You just want to make another call to the
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 14:25 -0800, John Chambers wrote:
I missed the earlier round of this discussion and only am commenting
now to say that this doesn't seem weird at all, if I understand what
you're trying to do.
Martin's basic suggestion,
v - callGeneric(e1, as(e2, A))
seems the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Morgan wrote:
Hi Ross --
Ross Boylan r...@biostat.ucsf.edu writes:
I have classes A and B, where B contains A. In the implementation of
the group generic for B I would like to use the corresponding group
generic for A. Is there a
Hi Ross --
Ross Boylan r...@biostat.ucsf.edu writes:
I have classes A and B, where B contains A. In the implementation of
the group generic for B I would like to use the corresponding group
generic for A. Is there a way to do that?
I would also appreciate any comments if what I'm trying
I have classes A and B, where B contains A. In the implementation of
the group generic for B I would like to use the corresponding group
generic for A. Is there a way to do that?
I would also appreciate any comments if what I'm trying to do seems like
the wrong approach.
Here's a stripped down
