This has been in the R-admin manual for a least a week, and I reported it
here earlier than that.
R 2.0.0 alpha does not allow f2c on 64-bit platforms.
It's all been dealt with quite awhile ago
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from the gentoo folks, on f2c problems with R
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
This has been in the R-admin manual for a least a week, and I reported it
here earlier than that.
R 2.0.0 alpha does not allow f2c on 64-bit platforms.
It's all been dealt with quite awhile ago
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
This is a repost of an earlier message (with a clearer example
demonstrating the problem I ran into). If you run the mle example in
stats4
library(stats4)
x - 0:10
y - c(26, 17, 13, 12, 20, 5, 9, 8, 5, 4, 8)
ll - function(ymax=15, xhalf=6)
-sum(stats::dpois(y,
We are currently on R 2.0.0 alpha. If you submit a bug fix, preferably
this week and at the latest next week, it will be considered for 2.0.0.
Please take seriously that R is an open project and does not have `staff'
to fix bugs. If you think it is worth fixing, please fix it for us
by
Daniel Hoppe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
This is a repost of an earlier message (with a clearer example
demonstrating the problem I ran into). If you run the mle example in
stats4
This happens because optim gets the old ndeps but just one variable to
optimize. The optim error is
Full_Name: Tom Short
Version: 1.9.1
OS: Win2000 Debian
Submission from: (NULL) (64.65.255.41)
WISHLIST:
axis() has a default parameter of lwd = 1. I want skinnier lines as the
default. If I change the default lty, it doesn't change what axis uses.
The following code produces a graph with a
This is deliberate, as processing can take a long time and we don't
want to lock R whilst a printer prints a file for example.
Just insert a sleep(1).
It certainly is not a bug, as no one said you would be able to access a
file immediately.
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before it's too late for R 2.0.0, do we have a final decision yet on
having a reorder method for factor in stats?
Deepayan
On Friday 03 September 2004 11:36, Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
I also have a reorder.factor defined in the gregmisc package. It has
a slighly different behavior.
It
My apologies for not including the transcript in the original message:
xx - rep(2.10,80)
groups.balanced - as.factor(c(rep(one,40),rep(two,40)))
groups.unbalanced - as.factor(c(rep(one,44),rep(two,36)))
t.test(xx ~ groups.balanced)
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: xx by
I am seeing NaNs, which is more sensible.
We will add a test for stderr small compared to the larger group mean.
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Tucker-Kellogg, Gregory wrote:
My apologies for not including the transcript in the original message:
xx - rep(2.10,80)
groups.balanced -
Thanks, I'm sure our users will welcome it.
This is also the fastest bug response I've ever seen on any software,
and much appreciated.
GTK
-Original Message-
From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:14 PM
To: Tucker-Kellogg, Gregory
Cc:
Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(original posting with quick workaround
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/04/07/1778.html)
Could well be fix, not just workaround Given that optim wasn't
designed to be able to hold arguments constant, any fix is going to be
somewhat
Dear R-devel
This one seems a bit arcane for R-help. I very often use R to call routines written in
Delphi (son of Pascal), doing persistent memory allocation within Delphi. That is, I
start R and load the Delphi DLL; then I use .C to call a Delphi routine which
allocates a piece of memory X
13 matches
Mail list logo
