I have some questions about
1. nomenclature,
2. recommended file locations and
3. overall procedure related to creating packages.
To the extent that it matters, examples here relate to Windows XP
R 2.0.1 beta.
The questions are interspersed and prefaced with ***.
My understanding
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a way to overload the ":" operator? I have a class called
> "ti", but I found that
>
> firstTi:secondTi
>
> does not dispatch to either Ops.ti nor to ":.ti" if I define that. Am I
> just out of luck?
Well, it is not in the Ops group, so
Please do not send reports on year-old versions of R: see the R posting
guide.
Please try the latest version of 2.0.1 beta, and if you can reproduce
this, send full instructions on how to reproduce it. However, check the
rw-FAQ first, for this looks like an error in your display drivers, not i
Is there a way to overload the ":" operator? I have a class called
"ti", but I found that
firstTi:secondTi
does not dispatch to either Ops.ti nor to ":.ti" if I define that. Am I
just out of luck?
Jeff
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat
This is a bug apparently caused by Windows XP's interaction with R.
I was getting an error message when running C:\Program
Files\R\rw1081\bin\Rgui.exe. Odly enough, his problem was happening only
when I was not connected to the network using my ethernet connection.
Using Google, I found the same
?methods
'removeGeneric', 'removeMethods': Remove the all the methods for
the generic function of this name.
--
SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] maili
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 19:01 +, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Marc Schwartz wrote:
snip
> > Prof. Ripley, is there a particular CRAN package upon which I can test
> > the bug issues that you refer to above to confirm their presence or
> > absence on FC3?
>
> I know minpack.l
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 08:05 +, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> > [Moved to R-devel.]
>
> > Second problem: gcc 3.4.2 does not work `just fine': it has a pesky bug
> > that causes several CRAN packages to fail/give incorrect answers. Now
> > Linux distro
On 11/10/04 12:41, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>On my system (a Dell 5150 laptop, nVidia GeForce FX Go 5200 with the
>nVidia 6629 driver, an internal 15" 1600x1200 panel and an external 20"
>Dell 2001FP 1600x1200 panel in non-xinerama dual-display mode), the
>X11() device comes up at 7" x 7" on both displ
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 08:05 +, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> [Moved to R-devel.]
> Second problem: gcc 3.4.2 does not work `just fine': it has a pesky bug
> that causes several CRAN packages to fail/give incorrect answers. Now
> Linux distros have a very nasty habit of distributing bug-enhanced
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, John Maindonald wrote:
> Although print.ts() formats times pleasantly when it prints
> regular multivariate time series (at least for suitable series)
> (try e.g.
> > xy <- cbind(window(AirPassengers, end =1950), 1:11)
I get an error here, as I should.
> > window(xy, end=1
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, John Maindonald wrote:
> I have posted, at http://wwwmaths.anu.edu.au/~john/r/newsets/
> image (.rda) files, and first stabs at .Rd files for various data on
> deaths in London from 1629 to 1939. (There are of course gaps.)
> The sources (Guy 1882 & Stocks 1942) are documente
À´¸åÊÕµ½£¬Ð»Ð»£¡
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
I have posted, at http://wwwmaths.anu.edu.au/~john/r/newsets/
image (.rda) files, and first stabs at .Rd files for various data on
deaths in London from 1629 to 1939. (There are of course gaps.)
The sources (Guy 1882 & Stocks 1942) are documented in the
.Rd files:
(1) poxetc: measles, smallpox & t
Although print.ts() formats times pleasantly when it prints
regular multivariate time series (at least for suitable series)
(try e.g.
> xy <- cbind(window(AirPassengers, end =1950), 1:11)
> window(xy, end=1949)
xy seqno
Jan 1949 112 1
)
I can find no immediate way to extract the pleas
[SupTec RSI] Email não enviado
Sua mensagem apresenta arquivo(s) anexo(s) que pela sua natureza podem conter
programas potencialmente portadores de vírus e, por este motivo tais arquivos
não foram encaminhados ao destinatário. Infelizmente tal procediment
[Moved to R-devel.]
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Jonathan Baron wrote:
> The RPM for Fedora Core 2 seems to work just fine on Core 3.
That's not what the subject line says, and is it really true? The RPM for
FC2 (I built one on x86_64, but I think it will be the same on your
unstated architecture) has gc
17 matches
Mail list logo
