Re: [Rd] make check-all fails (PR#7784)

2005-04-10 Thread Peter Dalgaard
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This looks more serious. 100 times machine precision is quite a large margin in these matters. Could you perhaps stick in a printout of the two terms and their difference? I have an ATLAS build on AMD64 and it

Re: [Rd] make check-all fails (PR#7784)

2005-04-10 Thread p . dalgaard
Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Aha! 100 times machine precision in not all that much when the numbers themselves are in double digits. In fact, one is over 100. The case that triggers the failure is #149 147 148 149 151 152

Re: [Rd] new R package BRugs

2005-04-10 Thread plummer
Quoting Uwe Ligges [EMAIL PROTECTED]: OK, here we go (since we forgot to address the the Linux folks' problems explicitly - apologies!). *In principle*, you need the 1.5 version of the BlackBox Compiler from http://www.oberon.ch/blackbox.html Details and documentation how to compile are

Re: [Rd] make check-all fails (PR#7784)

2005-04-10 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Peter Dalgaard wrote: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This looks more serious. 100 times machine precision is quite a large margin in these matters. Could you perhaps stick in a printout of the two terms and their difference? I have an ATLAS build

Re: [Rd] make check-all fails (PR#7784)

2005-04-10 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: Peter Dalgaard wrote: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This looks more serious. 100 times machine precision is quite a large margin in these matters. Could you perhaps stick in a printout of the two terms

Re: [Rd] make check-all fails (PR#7784)

2005-04-10 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think the issue is ATLAS on your old Athlon. ATLAS 3.6.0 compiled from the sources works correctly with gcc-3.4.3 on my Athlon MP (and also on an Athlon XP), but AFAIR those have instructions the Athlon Thunderbird does not have. (Both my

Re: [Rd] strange error with rw2010dev

2005-04-10 Thread Kjetil Brinchmann Halvorsen
The error reported below still occurs in todays (2005-04-08) rw2010beta, should I file a formal bug report? Kjetil. Kjetil Brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: With rw2010dev I get a strange protect(): protection stack overflow error with a small data frame which otherwise is usable: If anybody wants to

[Rd] S4 group methods don't dispatch for Summary?

2005-04-10 Thread Rich FitzJohn
Hi all, I am having a little problem with S4 group generics (apologies if I get some terminology wrong below). I'm finding I can set methods for some group generic functions, but not others: setClass(foo, representation(data=numeric)) x - new(foo, data=1:10) ## Setting Ops works just as