Re: [Rd] A 'true' R-wrapper for C++ classes

2005-04-18 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Ali - wrote: I am trying to wrap some C++ classes into R. (1) Comparing the OOP and methods packages, I have came to this conclusion that OOP works much better for this wrapper -- please correct me if I am wrong. One question is why this useful package (OOP) is not included i

Re: [Rd] A 'true' R-wrapper for C++ classes

2005-04-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
> Hello > > I am trying to wrap some C++ classes into R. > > (1) Comparing the OOP and methods packages, I have came to this conclusion > that OOP works much better for this wrapper -- please correct me if I am > wrong. The methods package using a different conceptual model of object-oriented prog

[Rd] A 'true' R-wrapper for C++ classes

2005-04-18 Thread Ali -
Hello I am trying to wrap some C++ classes into R. (1) Comparing the OOP and methods packages, I have came to this conclusion that OOP works much better for this wrapper -- please correct me if I am wrong. One question is why this useful package (OOP) is not included in the official release of R