> Sorry about the mistake in the previous post, here is the corrected
> version:
And I've just added responses to part of it:
> (3) The above model lacks something like an 'environment' for the pointer
> to
> the C++ object to live in it. Assume we create the foo class in R like:
>
> obj <- fo
Sorry about the mistake in the previous post, here is the corrected version:
Hello
I am trying to wrap some C++ classes into R.
(1) Comparing the OOP and methods packages, I have came to this conclusion
that OOP works much better for this wrapper -- please correct me if I am
wrong. One question is
