04
language R
>
Rajiv
> -Original Message-
> From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 9:47 AM
> To: Prasad, Rajiv
> Cc: Peter Dalgaard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Rd] Re: [R] Problem Compiling R-2.0.0 on Linux Alpha
&
"Prasad, Rajiv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, Peter, and Prof. Ripley.
>
> My efforts last night was mostly futile except that it told me about the
> embedded newline in Built field.
>
> Prof. Ripley: how do I get your fixes? Can I just download
> R-2.0.0-patched?
With a little patienc
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, Prasad, Rajiv wrote:
> Thanks, Peter, and Prof. Ripley.
>
> My efforts last night was mostly futile except that it told me about the
> embedded newline in Built field.
>
> Prof. Ripley: how do I get your fixes? Can I just download
> R-2.0.0-patched?
Yes, tomorrow's tarball
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Rd] Re: [R] Problem Compiling R-2.0.0 on Linux Alpha
On 17 Oct 2004, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> This is not an architecture-specific bug at all, it just happens to be
> tickled by the specific length of "alphapca56-unknown-linux-gnu"!
>
> I'm unsur
On 17 Oct 2004, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> This is not an architecture-specific bug at all, it just happens to be
> tickled by the specific length of "alphapca56-unknown-linux-gnu"!
>
> I'm unsure whether the problem is in read.dcf or whether
> split_description could just use strsplit(Built, ";[ \n
"Prasad, Rajiv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the reply, Peter.
>
> The build is done in a clean directory, and --without-tcltk does not
> help. I thought it is much better to track this down and fix it anyway.
>
> Agreed there aren't too many Alphas out there anymore, but I plan to
