Hi
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Thanks. Yet one other comment to consider when thinking
about this. Even if its not possible
or advisable to guarantee order, even without the hash=
idea, it may be possible to guarantee that default names
are generated in some order that can be used by
getChildre
Thanks. Yet one other comment to consider when thinking
about this. Even if its not possible
or advisable to guarantee order, even without the hash=
idea, it may be possible to guarantee that default names
are generated in some order that can be used by
getChildren to ensure that it returns the c
Hi
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Here is the code once again. This time I have supplied two
names methods and a getChildren.viewport function to
encapsulate the corresponding grid internals. It would
be easiest if grid provided these itself but in the absence
of that this does encapsulate depen
Just one additional item. Look at:
?new.env
for an example of where this approach is used in R, noting the
hash= argument.
On 6/7/05, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I understand that although such order is convenient for
> the user as the significant reduction in code size
Yes, I understand that although such order is convenient for
the user as the significant reduction in code size here shows. I
wonder if there might be some performance parameter (e.g. hash)
to control it. If hash = TRUE then no guarantee is provided. Otherwise
order is kept.
On 6/7/05, Paul Mur
Here is the code once again. This time I have supplied two
names methods and a getChildren.viewport function to
encapsulate the corresponding grid internals. It would
be easiest if grid provided these itself but in the absence
of that this does encapsulate dependencies on grid
internals to a we
Hi
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 6/7/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 6/6/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 6/2/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Thanks. I have mucked around i
On 6/7/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > On 6/6/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>
> >>Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 6/2/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Than
Hi
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 6/6/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 6/2/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Thanks. I have mucked around in vpTree structures and discovered its
actually quite easy to specify children so I have
On 6/6/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > On 6/2/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi
> >
> >
> > Thanks. I have mucked around in vpTree structures and discovered its
> > actually quite easy to specify children so I have changed
Hi
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 6/2/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Thanks. I have mucked around in vpTree structures and discovered its
actually quite easy to specify children so I have changed my example
so that instead of naming the children of 'layout' and then remember
On 6/2/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
Thanks. I have mucked around in vpTree structures and discovered its
actually quite easy to specify children so I have changed my example
so that instead of naming the children of 'layout' and then remembering
coordinates linked to the name
On 6/1/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > [moved from r-help to r-devel]
> >
> > On 5/31/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> # mm.row[j] gives the row in the layout of the jth cell
> >>> # mm.col[j] gives the col in the l
On 6/1/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > [moved from r-help to r-devel]
> >
> > On 5/31/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> # mm.row[j] gives the row in the layout of the jth cell
> >>> # mm.col[j] gives the col in the l
Hi
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
[moved from r-help to r-devel]
On 5/31/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# mm.row[j] gives the row in the layout of the jth cell
# mm.col[j] gives the col in the layout of the jth cell
mm <- matrix(seq(nr*nc), nr, nc)
mm.row <- c(row(mm))
mm.
[moved from r-help to r-devel]
On 5/31/05, Paul Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ># mm.row[j] gives the row in the layout of the jth cell
> ># mm.col[j] gives the col in the layout of the jth cell
> >mm <- matrix(seq(nr*nc), nr, nc)
> >mm.row <- c(row(mm))
> >mm.col <- c(c
16 matches
Mail list logo
