[Rd] suggestion for ARMAacf()

2004-08-17 Thread Hiroyuki Kawakatsu
hi, in 1.9.1, the return value from ARMAacf(pacf=TRUE) is not named by lags, contrary to ?ARMAacf. the simple fix is to move names(Acf) - down after if(pacf), with an appropriate starting lag as pacf=TRUE appears to start at lag 1 (whereas pacf=FALSE starts at lag 0). for consistency, one could

Re: [Rd] suggestion for ARMAacf()

2004-08-17 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Please supply a patch (diff -c or diff -u) against the current R-devel sources, so there is no ambiguity as to what you are suggesting, together with examples and the intended output. Verbal descriptions like this are not precise enough to be cross-checked. On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Hiroyuki