] Enhanced version of plot.lm()
NB also the mention of a possible addition to stats: vif()
Dear John -
I think users can cope with six plots offered by one
function, with four of them given by default, and the two
remaining plots alternative ways of presenting the
information in the final default
;
'David Firth'; 'Martin Maechler'
Subject: Re: [Rd] Enhanced version of plot.lm()
NB also the mention of a possible addition to stats: vif()
Dear John -
I think users can cope with six plots offered by one
function, with
four of them given by default, and the two remaining plots
] Enhanced version of plot.lm()
On 28 Apr 2005, at 1:30 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
PD == Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 27 Apr 2005 16:54:02 +0200 writes:
PD Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm about to commit the current proposal(s) to R-devel,
**INCLUDING
Subject: Re: [Rd] Enhanced version of plot.lm()
On 28 Apr 2005, at 1:30 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
PD == Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 27 Apr 2005 16:54:02 +0200 writes:
PD Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm about to commit the current proposal(s) to R-devel,
**INCLUDING
Dear John
-Original Message-
From: John Maindonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:47 PM
To: John Fox
Cc: 'Werner Stahel'; 'Peter Dalgaard';
r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch; 'David Firth'; 'Martin Maechler'
Subject: Re: [Rd] Enhanced version of plot.lm
MM == Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:13:38 +0200 writes:
JMd == John Maindonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:44:26 +1000 writes:
JMd The web page http://wwwmaths.anu.edu.au/~johnm/r/plot-lm/
JMd now includes files:
JMd plot.lm.RData:
Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm about to commit the current proposal(s) to R-devel,
**INCLUDING** changing the default from
'which = 1:4' to 'which = c(1:3,5)
and ellicit feedback starting from there.
One thing I think I would like is to use color for the
PD == Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 27 Apr 2005 16:54:02 +0200 writes:
PD Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm about to commit the current proposal(s) to R-devel,
**INCLUDING** changing the default from
'which = 1:4' to 'which = c(1:3,5)
and
On 28 Apr 2005, at 1:30 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
PD == Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 27 Apr 2005 16:54:02 +0200 writes:
PD Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm about to commit the current proposal(s) to R-devel,
**INCLUDING** changing the default from
'which = 1:4' to
On 25 Apr 2005, at 8:00 PM, David Firth wrote:
From: David Firth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 April 2005 10:23:51 PM
To: John Maindonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [Rd] Enhanced version of plot.lm()
On 24 Apr 2005, at 05:37
Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would be non-compatible though for all those that have
always used the current default 1:4.
OTOH, MASS or Peter Dalgaard's book don't mention plot(lm fit )
or at least don't show it's result.
Ummm, check page 183...
--
O__ Peter
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would be non-compatible though for all those that have
always used the current default 1:4.
OTOH, MASS or Peter Dalgaard's book don't mention plot(lm fit )
or at least don't show it's result.
Ummm, check
@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [Rd] Enhanced version of plot.lm()
On 24 Apr 2005, at 05:37, John Maindonald wrote:
I'd not like to lose the signs of the residuals. Also, as
plots 1-3 focus on residuals, there is less of a mental
leap in moving to residuals vs leverage; residuals vs
leverage/(1-leverage
On 24 Apr 2005, at 05:37, John Maindonald wrote:
I'd not like to lose the signs of the residuals. Also, as
plots 1-3 focus on residuals, there is less of a mental
leap in moving to residuals vs leverage; residuals vs
leverage/(1-leverage) would also be in the same spirit.
Yes, I know what you
On 23 Apr 2005, at 12:30, John Maindonald wrote:
I propose the following enhancements and changes to plot.lm(),
the most important of which is the addition of a Residuals vs
Leverage plot.
(1) A residual versus leverage plot has been added, available
by specifying which = 5, and not included as
I'd not like to lose the signs of the residuals. Also, as
plots 1-3 focus on residuals, there is less of a mental
leap in moving to residuals vs leverage; residuals vs
leverage/(1-leverage) would also be in the same spirit.
Maybe, one way or another, both plots (residuals vs
a function of
16 matches
Mail list logo
