Re: [Rd] SVN revision numbers

2005-05-18 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005, Cyrus Harmon wrote: Following up on my own post... touching non-tarball and then doing a make fixes the problem. I assume this is documented somewhere and I just missed it. The make process does touch non-tarball: you may need to

Re: [Rd] SVN revision numbers

2005-05-18 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Cyrus Harmon wrote: Following up on my own post... touching non-tarball and then doing a make fixes the problem. I assume this is documented somewhere and I just missed it. The make process does touch non-tarball: you may need to start from a clean build. (BTW, that's not n

Re: [Rd] SVN revision numbers

2005-05-18 Thread Cyrus Harmon
Following up on my own post... touching non-tarball and then doing a make fixes the problem. I assume this is documented somewhere and I just missed it. Cyrus On May 18, 2005, at 1:36 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote: I'm seeing an error about not being able to find SVN-REVISION in the R (top src dir)

Re: [Rd] SVN revision numbers

2005-05-18 Thread Cyrus Harmon
I'm seeing an error about not being able to find SVN-REVISION in the R (top src dir) when I try to build from current SVN sources. Is this a file that is supposed to be generated that I'm not generating for some reason, or is this supposed to be in the SVN repository? My apologies if I'm cat