What is the difference (if any) between SOM() function
in library(class) and the som_pack algorithm?
Which is the neighborhood and alpha function types
used in SOM()?
Thanks,
Manuel
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/l
Hi Peter,
thanks. Yet my intention was not to discuss whether this could be done
at all (never had any doubts about that), but how it could be done
nicely and conveniently for the application programmer.
Best regards
Wolfgang
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Wolfgang Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sprintf() in R-devel is now vectorized, re-cycling its arguments,
including fmt, as required.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Wolfgang Huber wrote:
Hi Peter,
thanks. Yet my intention was not to discuss whether this could be done at all
(never had any doubts about that), but how it could be done nicely and
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sprintf() in R-devel is now vectorized, re-cycling its arguments,
> including fmt, as required.
Thanks, Brian.
This leaves me with one question: what is actually the wisdom behind
the USE.NAMES default in mapply? Seems to me that it gets in the wa
If changes to sprintf behavior are being considered, would it
be possible to allow some of the other K&R conversion
specifiers?
xX - for integer to hex conversion, and
c - for ascii value to character conversion
would all be useful for me.
Thanks, Steve Dutky
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:02:20 +
Patches against the current R-devel sources will be considered, but note
that 'x' is already there, and there is rawToChar.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Steve Dutky wrote:
If changes to sprintf behavior are being considered, would it
be possible to allow some of the other K&R conversion
specifiers?
xX -
From memory, the "RUnit" package (by Burger, Juenemann and Koenig) does
some source code analysis to provide some statistics regarding tests and
source code (but I don't remember seeing anything to compute complexity
metrics in there.)
-- Tony
At Monday 09:08 AM 2/14/2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
A
