Hi,
in last nights alpha version, `var' is broken:
R var(rnorm(100))
Error in var(rnorm(100)) : 3 arguments passed to cov which requires 4.
which I suspect is due to recent changes to `cov'. The same is true for
R cov(rnorm(100), rnorm(100))
Error in cov(rnorm(100), rnorm(100)) : 3 arguments
Yes these two are related, but the e-mail subject is wrong:
It's *your* fault because you must have unpacked the new version
on top of an older one.
The official alpha version (Snapshots from here, or rsync) do
not have your problem:
Before a few days ago, there were files
This is not a bug. It indicates that *you* don't have direct internet
access. There is an item in the rw-FAQ about this.
Please do not use R-bugs to report problems in your own environment, nor to
ask questions (especially those covered in FAQs).
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a bug. It indicates that *you* don't have direct internet
access. There is an item in the rw-FAQ about this.
Please do not use R-bugs to report problems in your own environment, nor to
ask questions (especially those covered in FAQs).
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the recent OS changes (windows 2000) necessitated by various worms, etc, I have
now been receiving this error message when I run update and I am not sure how I can
correct.
update.packages()
trying URL
Torsten == Torsten Hothorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:54:20 +0200 (CEST) writes:
Yes these two are related, but the e-mail subject is
wrong: It's *your* fault because you must have unpacked
the new version on top of an older one. The official
alpha version
On Martedì, set 16, 2003, at 11:35 Europe/Rome, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 10:24 AM, Stefano Iacus wrote:
It seems that RAqua consumes too much cpu time when doing nothing.
I can't see exactly why this is happening. We have few days to fix
this up. Any idea (after
Stefano Iacus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Martedì, set 16, 2003, at 11:35 Europe/Rome, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 10:24 AM, Stefano Iacus wrote:
It seems that RAqua consumes too much cpu time when doing nothing.
I can't see exactly why this is happening.
Hello ...
With a new checkout of R-devel (last update was 2003-09-11) we are having
a problem (it seems to be happening to all of us here on a few different
machines) where during install/check/etc when the 'save image' happens (in
packages using 'save image'):
** save image
Error: couldn't
Did you make sure that you have
require(methods)
early in your R sources for the package?
No, and that was exactly the problem (although specifically I put the
'require(methods)' into the R_PROFILE.R file). I was under the impression
that methods was always loaded by default when R started up
Jeff Gentry wrote:
Hello ...
With a new checkout of R-devel (last update was 2003-09-11) we are having
a problem (it seems to be happening to all of us here on a few different
machines) where during install/check/etc when the 'save image' happens (in
packages using 'save image'):
**
It's not been a valid assumption ever (or as long as I can recall).
The only thing you can assume in base. We try to be careful in the R
tarball, but things slip past.
BDR
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Jeff Gentry wrote:
Did you make sure that you have
require(methods)
early in your R sources
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, John Chambers wrote:
Jeff Gentry wrote:
Hello ...
With a new checkout of R-devel (last update was 2003-09-11) we are having
a problem (it seems to be happening to all of us here on a few different
machines) where during install/check/etc when the 'save image'
Full_Name: Axel Benz
Version: 1.7.1
OS: Windows
Submission from: (NULL) (137.251.33.43)
Hello,
I guess many people will answer me again that this is a S language feature, but
I am only a stupid computer scientist and I simply do not understand this logic,
despite of reading a lot about S:
test
John Chambers writes:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, John Chambers wrote:
Jeff Gentry wrote:
Hello ...
With a new checkout of R-devel (last update was 2003-09-11) we are having
a problem (it seems to be happening to all of us here on a few different
Kurt Hornik wrote:
John Chambers writes:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, John Chambers wrote:
Jeff Gentry wrote:
Hello ...
With a new checkout of R-devel (last update was 2003-09-11) we are having
a problem (it seems to be happening to all of us
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full_Name: Axel Benz
Version: 1.7.1
OS: Windows
Submission from: (NULL) (137.251.33.43)
Hello, I guess many people will answer me again that this is a S
language feature, but I am only a stupid computer scientist and I simply
do not understand
There seems to be a bug in hclust (package mva) for clustering
methods 'median' and 'centroid'.
I have written a clustering program in C and discovered that the
results for 'median' differ from those of hclust in R. I used a
third program, written by someone else in Pascal, and that
program
plot.hclust:
Setting up a window for a dendrogram assumes the first link is
the shortest and the last is the longest. This is not always the
case when the clustering was done with hclust, method=median
or method=centroid, and the dendrogram sometimes doesn't fit
within the window.
I propose the
19 matches
Mail list logo
