Re: [Rd] bug + insufficient doc in R CMD INSTALL (PR#5703)

2003-12-12 Thread Kurt Hornik
dpierce writes: Hello, I believe I have found a bug in the R INSTALL script (src/scripts/INSTALL.in). The problem comes up when a user tries to specify more than one --config-args (or, I imagine, --config-vars) on the R CMD INSTALL line. In such a case, no error message is generated, but

[Rd] legend() graphics output bug (PR#5725)

2003-12-12 Thread gasser
Full_Name: Daniel Gasser Version: 1.8.1 OS: Win XP Submission from: (NULL) (130.60.20.92) The legend()-Function shows a different behaviour than it did in Version 1.6.1. It plots a black box left of the legend lines on each legend row. In 1.6.1 there was just the line in appropriate color for

[Rd] Bug in pbinom? (PR#5727)

2003-12-12 Thread liebscher
Dear colleagues, the command pbinom(size=1.95*10^10,prob=seq(1.02,1.03,10^-3)*10^-10,q=1,lower=F,log=T) produced the output [1] -46.0120973 -46.0101369 -46.0081784 -46.0062239 -46.0042692 -46.0023165 [7] -0.5205666 -0.5196801 -0.5187944 -0.5179102 -0.5170278 what seems strange. Has

Re: [Rd] legend() graphics output bug (PR#5725)

2003-12-12 Thread ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Daniel Gasser Version: 1.8.1 OS: Win XP Submission from: (NULL) (130.60.20.92) The legend()-Function shows a different behaviour than it did in Version 1.6.1. It plots a black box left of the legend lines on each legend row. In 1.6.1 there was just

Re: [Rd] legend() graphics output bug (PR#5725)

2003-12-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Daniel Gasser Version: 1.8.1 OS: Win XP Submission from: (NULL) (130.60.20.92) The legend()-Function shows a different behaviour than it did in Version 1.6.1. It plots a black box left of the

Re: [Rd] Bug in pbinom? (PR#5727)

2003-12-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Oh, come on: have you never heard of the Poisson approximation? ppois(1, 1.95*seq(1.02,1.03,10^-3), lower=F,log=T) [1] -0.5259247 -0.5250276 -0.5241321 -0.5232383 -0.5223462 -0.5214557 [7] -0.5205669 -0.5196798 -0.5187943 -0.5179104 -0.5170282 Probably you believe that computers never make

Re: [Rd] Failed installation on Mac OSX 10.3 (PR#5697)

2003-12-12 Thread Brian Beckage
I did read the readme.txt but it said you 'should' install the libreadline so my impression was that it was recommended but not necessary. Undoubtedly, an oversight on my part. Brian On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, stefano iacus wrote: You should read the readme.txt file which says that you have to

Re: [Rd] Failed installation on Mac OSX 10.3 (PR#5697)

2003-12-12 Thread stefano iacus
We are probably both right as the readme.txt file says You should also install the other three packages: 1. libreadline (unless you have this package already installed) 2. tcltk (this is a must if you want to use tcltk) 3. libxml2 (if you want to use the XML package) stefano On Venerdì, dic 12,

Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Paul Gilbert
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: There are a small number of CRAN packages that attempt to modify system functions and so will need updating. (Known examples are in dse:tframe, gregmisc and mclust and some testing code elsewhere.) Brian What do you mean by updating? In tframe I modify a few functions

Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Paul Gilbert
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Paul Gilbert wrote: Prof Brian Ripley wrote: There are a small number of CRAN packages that attempt to modify system functions and so will need updating. (Known examples are in dse:tframe, gregmisc and mclust and some testing code

Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Paul Gilbert
Henrik Thanks for the suggestion. I am not sure that I have sufficient control over the functions that make an object Ttframed. I will have to explore a bit further to know that, and I am about to get on a plane so it will be awhile before I have a chance to do that. My first reaction is to

[Rd] A christmas gift for you rtfeb ybksj (PR#5734)

2003-12-12 Thread dnp0uocoin
--76_91.FB28F_3C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQpIaSwNCg0KR3JlYXQgcmF0ZXMgZm9yIHRoZSBob2xpZGF5cyEgDQoNClJlZmluYW5jZSB0 b2RheSB0byBhcyBsb3cgYXMgMi45NSUhDQpTYXZlIHRob3VzYW5kcyBvZiBkb2xsYXJzIG9y

Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Luke Tierney
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Paul Gilbert wrote: If I understand this change correctly, I think is wrong for R-core to think it is a small change. It has much more serious consequences for me than any changes introduced R 1.0. It definitely should not be introduced at a dot level release unless