Hi,
Not that rare presumably, but I've just got R up and running on NetBSD
2.0/i386, using gcc 3.3.3, straight from the packages collection (this
does apply a few patches to the configure script, and I have not
examined what they are).
make check does fail, however, as it cannot load package
Full_Name: Chien-yu Peng
Version: 2.0.1
OS: Windows XP Professional
Submission from: (NULL) (140.109.72.181)
Dear all:
Although I don't know you, I am thankful for your help.
When I use the function mantelhaen.test for R x C x K (R, C 2) table,
the output is not the same as SAS's. I
I'm trying to compile R-beta on IRIX using the native MipsPro 7.4
compilers, without great satisfaction. A list of problems is given
below, and any advice on solving them is appreciated.
Martyn
Configuration:
-
Here are the configuration options I am using
./configure CC=cc CXX=CC
chienyu writes:
Full_Name: Chien-yu Peng
Version: 2.0.1
OS: Windows XP Professional
Submission from: (NULL) (140.109.72.181)
Dear all:
Although I don't know you, I am thankful for your help.
When I use the function mantelhaen.test for R x C x K (R, C 2) table,
the output is
Thanks for the report and code.
There's two parts to this: a suggested enhancement to show components of
the (R-1)(C-1) df general association test that are useful for ordinal
variables, and a bug report on the test itself: R gives 35.9 and the
suggested code (and apparently SAS) give 10.6.
So R is on subversion right? So why doesn't somebody authoritative
get r-project.org on the subversion testimonials page?
http://subversion.tigris.org/testimonials.html
Just a suggestion.
--
Charles Geyer
Professor, School of Statistics
University of Minnesota
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought I'd give this another shot before the official release. I tried
building R-beta_2004-04-07 on the AIX system that I have access to, and it
seemed to failed at lazy-loading survival. I'd very much appreciate any
pointer on what to try or look for next.
1. I set OBJECT_MODE to 64 for
Dear R-devel,
A colleague was recently surprised by the behavior of the : operator (as
sequence generator), so I decided to dig a little bit. Here are a couple of
things I found.
- ?: seems a bit imprecise. The Details section says:
`The operator : and the seq(from, to) form generate the
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Liaw, Andy wrote:
- It seems counter-intuitive to allow non-integer values as operand for :.
It also seems a bit odd that 1:2 returns something with storage.mode
integer, whereas 0.5:2 gives doubles. Would it make sense to disallow
non-integer operands to :? I can't think of
Full_Name: Peter Fortini
Version: 2.0.1
OS: Windows 2000
Submission from: (NULL) (65.246.187.164)
When the imaginary part of the argument is very large, the complex tangent
function returns 0+NaNi. For example, tan(1+1000i)=0+NaNi; it should be 0+1i
Easy to fix in complex.c, as the original
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
static void z_tan(Rcomplex *r, Rcomplex *z)
{
double x2, y2, den;
x2 = 2.0 * z-r;
y2 = 2.0 * z-i;
den = cos(x2) + cosh(y2);
r-r = sin(x2)/den;
/* any limit above about log(DBL_EPSILON) will do */
if (fabs(r-i) 40.0)
You need z-i (or
Charles Geyer wrote:
So R is on subversion right? So why doesn't somebody authoritative
get r-project.org on the subversion testimonials page?
http://subversion.tigris.org/testimonials.html
Just a suggestion.
Considering the number of times that the subversion server has locked up
on us I'm
Full_Name: Benjamin Tyner
Version: R version 2.0.1, 2004-11-15
OS: Linux (kernel version 2.6.10-1.770_FC3)
Submission from: (NULL) (4.64.8.220)
On my build, for example:
library(GeneTS)
fisher.g.test.single(rnorm(341)) #this works fine
fisher.g.test.single(rnorm(342)) #this fails with the
From: Thomas Lumley
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Liaw, Andy wrote:
- It seems counter-intuitive to allow non-integer values as
operand for :.
It also seems a bit odd that 1:2 returns something with storage.mode
integer, whereas 0.5:2 gives doubles. Would it make sense
to disallow
14 matches
Mail list logo
