M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks more serious. 100 times machine precision is quite a large
margin in these matters. Could you perhaps stick in a printout of the
two terms and their difference?
I have an ATLAS build on AMD64 and it
Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aha! 100 times machine precision in not all that much when the numbers
themselves are in double digits. In fact, one is over 100. The case
that triggers the failure is #149
147 148 149 151 152
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks more serious. 100 times machine precision is quite a large
margin in these matters. Could you perhaps stick in a printout of the
two terms and their difference?
I have an ATLAS build
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks more serious. 100 times machine precision is quite a large
margin in these matters. Could you perhaps stick in a printout of the
two terms
Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the issue is ATLAS on your old Athlon. ATLAS 3.6.0 compiled
from the sources works correctly with gcc-3.4.3 on my Athlon MP (and
also on an Athlon XP), but AFAIR those have instructions the Athlon
Thunderbird does not have. (Both my
Full_Name: Ed Borasky
Version: R-beta 2.1.0 2005-04-08
OS: Linux 2.6.11 GCC 3.3.5
Submission from: (NULL) (24.21.57.139)
I downloaded the latest R-beta tarball and did a build with the default options.
OS is Linux 2.6.11 and compiler is GCC 3.3.5. make check-all failed with the
following
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Full_Name: Ed Borasky
Version: R-beta 2.1.0 2005-04-08
OS: Linux 2.6.11 GCC 3.3.5
Submission from: (NULL) (24.21.57.139)
I downloaded the latest R-beta tarball and did a build with the default
options.
OS is Linux 2.6.11 and compiler is GCC 3.3.5. make
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Full_Name: Ed Borasky
Version: R-beta 2.1.0 2005-04-08
OS: Linux 2.6.11 GCC 3.3.5
Submission from: (NULL) (24.21.57.139)
I downloaded the latest R-beta tarball and did a build with the default
options.
OS is Linux 2.6.11 and compiler is GCC
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Hmm, could you replace the a1 == a2 with all.equal(a1, a2) instead?
(inside reg-tests-1.R of course)
Asking for identity up to machine precision does look a bit optimistic...
That worked ... it got through reg-tests-1.R fine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks more serious. 100 times machine precision is quite a large
margin in these matters. Could you perhaps stick in a printout of the
two terms and their difference?
I have an ATLAS build on AMD64 and it passes all the checks, but it is
using ATLAS 3.7.8, so you
10 matches
Mail list logo