Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Peter Dalgaard pda...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I.e., that R reverts to using indicator variables when the intercept is
absent.
Is there any nice way of getting contr.sum coding for the interaction
as opposed to the ugly code in my post
Le 22/04/10 02:19, Dominick Samperi a écrit :
There appears to be a bug in RUnit.
Given a testsuite testsuite.math, say, when I run:
runTestSuite(testsuite.math)
this works fine, provided there are no extraneous files in the
unit test subdirectory.
But if there are any Emacs temp files
Is this a thumbs up for memcpy for DUPLICATE_ATOMIC_VECTOR at least ?
If there is further specific testing then let me know, happy to help, but
you seem to have beaten me to it.
Matthew
Simon Urbanek simon.urba...@r-project.org wrote in message
Just to add some clarification, the suggestion wasn't motivated by speeding
up a length 3 vector being recycled 3.3 million times. But its a good point
that any change should not make that case slower. I don't know how much
vectorCopy is called really, DUPLICATE_ATOMIC_VECTOR seems more
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Peter Dalgaard pda...@gmail.com wrote:
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Peter Dalgaard pda...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I.e., that R reverts to using indicator variables when the intercept is
absent.
Is there any nice way of getting
On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Is this a thumbs up for memcpy for DUPLICATE_ATOMIC_VECTOR at least ?
If there is further specific testing then let me know, happy to help, but
you seem to have beaten me to it.
I was not volunteering to do anything - I was just
Romain has already given you the answer. As would have the help page
?defineTestSuite
Not a bug, but a user error, I assume.
Matthias
Dominick Samperi wrote, On 04/22/10 02:19:
There appears to be a bug in RUnit.
Given a testsuite testsuite.math, say, when I run:
Hello R developers,
I sincerely apologize if the answer to this question is clearly documented
somewhere, but I was unable to figure it out over my morning coffee.
I just downloaded today's release of R 2.11.0 and installed it on my Windows
7 64 bit VM. I also downloaded the latest version of
On 22/04/2010 3:04 PM, Sharpie wrote:
Hello R developers,
I sincerely apologize if the answer to this question is clearly documented
somewhere, but I was unable to figure it out over my morning coffee.
I just downloaded today's release of R 2.11.0 and installed it on my Windows
7 64 bit VM. I
Duncan Murdoch-2 wrote:
You can use the Rtools for the stuff other than the compilers. You need
the MinGW 64 bit versions of the compilers; they are not nicely packaged
yet, but the instructions for finding them are in the new version of the
R-admin manual, in the section 3.3, Building
Thanks. With help from Matthias I discovered that I was using the wrong
RUnit docs.
I was using the Nov. 25, 2009 paper by Matthias and two others instead of
the online RUnit package docs, where a more robust regular expression
appears.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Romain Francois
Hi,
I'm getting a segmentation fault as follows:
---cut here---start--
R begt - as.POSIXct(strptime(10/01/2009 06:00:00, format=%d/%m/%Y
%H:%M:%S),
+tz=GMT)
R tser - seq(begt, by=5, length.out=91000)
R tser.trunc -
12 matches
Mail list logo
