Simon Urbanek simon.urba...@r-project.org
on Sun, 6 Feb 2011 20:53:01 -0500 writes:
On Feb 6, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
Hi
On 3/02/2011 1:23 p.m., Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Feb 2, 2011, at 7:00 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
Hi
Ben Bolker bbol...@gmail.com
on Sat, 5 Feb 2011 15:58:09 -0500 writes:
A bug was recently posted to the R bug database (which
probably would better have been posted as a query here) as
to why this happens:
print(7.921,digits=2)
[1] 8
print(7.92,digits=2)
Dear all,
There seems to be a problem with named chunks in Sweave with the version
of R under development (downloaded yesterday). When I sweave the file
toto.Rnw described at the end of this mail (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS), the
function Sweave returns an Internal error:
utils::Sweave(toto.Rnw)
Thanks, I'll take a look. The internal error message was intended to
catch this kind of problem.
Duncan Murdoch
On 07/02/2011 7:36 AM, Clément Calenge wrote:
Dear all,
There seems to be a problem with named chunks in Sweave with the version
of R under development (downloaded yesterday).
This should be fixed as of r54259.
Duncan Murdoch
On 07/02/2011 7:36 AM, Clément Calenge wrote:
Dear all,
There seems to be a problem with named chunks in Sweave with the version
of R under development (downloaded yesterday). When I sweave the file
toto.Rnw described at the end of this mail
Ben Bolker bbol...@gmail.com
on Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:44:12 -0500 writes:
?axTicks says:
usr: numeric vector of length four, defaulting to
‘par(usr)’ giving horizontal (‘x’) and vertical (‘y’)
user coordinate limits.
but this is not how the function is
I was looking for all the glm-related 'family' functions
in stats using the following predicate that returns TRUE
for any function whose first argument is called link.
is.family - function(object) is.function(object)
identical(names(as.list(object))[1], link)
It threw an error
For this application I would use names(formals(object)) to extract the
formal arguments.
luke
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, William Dunlap wrote:
I was looking for all the glm-related 'family' functions
in stats using the following predicate that returns TRUE
for any function whose first argument is
This is because there is an as.list.function, but your classed object
does not inherit from 'function'.
However, I think coercing to a list is S-like, and in R we have
formals() and body(), and I think you want the former.
Seems this was a late 2008 change: maybe the author can tell us why
Hi all,
Is there any relationship between save and serialize? Do they use the
same algorithm?
Hadley
--
Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
Department of Statistics / Rice University
http://had.co.nz/
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any relationship between save and serialize? Do they use the
same algorithm?
See the R-internals manual: there is more info in the R-devel version,
not least because saveRDS() is added to the mix.
But basically serialize() and
Also, if it it adds any value to what you are looking for, the output
of serialize() also has header information, cf. R-devel thread 'Small
inconsistency in serialize() between R versions and implications on
digest()' started March 7, 2007:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:56:18AM +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
Ben Bolker bbol...@gmail.com
on Sat, 5 Feb 2011 15:58:09 -0500 writes:
A bug was recently posted to the R bug database (which
probably would better have been posted as a query here) as
to why this
A follow-up on this.
Cygwin has recently[*] added support for C99 complex math, taken from
NetBSD with code that is very similar to that from Steven Moshier
available via http://www.moshier.net/c9x_readme.html.
That code isn't entirely right, especially not at the cuts on the
inverse
Thanks to you both for the information - that's exactly the level of
detail I was looking for. I ask because I want to play around with a
function to automatically cache expensive operations to disk, in a way
that can be lazy loaded on the next run.
Hadley
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Henrik
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Hadley Wickham had...@rice.edu wrote:
Thanks to you both for the information - that's exactly the level of
detail I was looking for. I ask because I want to play around with a
function to automatically cache expensive operations to disk, in a way
that can be
16 matches
Mail list logo
