Awesome, thank you Michael!
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Michael Lawrence
wrote:
> I ported that over.
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Andrzej Oleś
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Michael for updating the 3.4 branch, the `callNextMethod()` now
I ported that over.
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Andrzej Oleś wrote:
> Thank you Michael for updating the 3.4 branch, the `callNextMethod()` now
> works for `...` methods as expected. However, I'm still missing your other
> patch fixing the handling of arguments in
Thank you Michael for updating the 3.4 branch, the `callNextMethod()` now
works for `...` methods as expected. However, I'm still missing your other
patch fixing the handling of arguments in `...` methods. It would be really
great if this bugfix could be integrated into the 3.4 branch as well,
I pushed the patch to the 3.4 branch. Feel free to test.
Michael
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Andrzej Oleś wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> it seems that your patch to S4 generics dispatching on `...` is still
> available only in R-devel, and was not included in the minor
Hi Michael,
it seems that your patch to S4 generics dispatching on `...` is still
available only in R-devel, and was not included in the minor R-3.4.1
release. I was wondering what is the policy of incorporating bug fixes from
the devel branch into release, and whether there is any chance that
You're right, I must have mixed up my R versions when running the example,
as the problem seems to be resolved in R-devel.
Sorry for the noise and thanks again for fixing this.
Andrzej
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
> I attempted to fix
I attempted to fix it, and that example seems to work for me. It's
also a (passing) regression test in R. Are you sure you're using a new
enough R-devel?
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Andrzej Oleś wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> thanks again for your patch! I've tested it
Hi Michael,
thanks again for your patch! I've tested it and I'm happy to confirm that
`callNextMethod()` works with methods dispatching on `...`.
However, the second issue I reported still seems to be unresolved. Consider
the following toy example, where the `f()` calls differ in result
Great, thanks Michael for you quick response!
I started off with a question on SO because I was not sure whether this was
an actual bug or I was just missing something obvious. I'm looking forward
to the patch.
Cheers,
Andrzej
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Michael Lawrence <
Thanks for pointing out these issues. I have a fix that I will commit soon.
Btw, I would never have seen the post on Stack Overflow. It's best to
report bugs on the bugzilla.
Michael
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Andrzej Oleś wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently
10 matches
Mail list logo