The patch indeed solves the issue.
Thanks much,
G.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:29 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 12/07/2018 9:46 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:30 PM Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch
> >> wrote:
> >>> I think I
On 12/07/2018 9:46 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:30 PM Gábor Csárdi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes
\Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author (who might have been
me,
On 12/07/2018 9:46 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:30 PM Gábor Csárdi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes
\Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author (who might have been
me,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:30 PM Gábor Csárdi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
> > I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes
> > \Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author (who might have been
> > me, I forget) assumed that would
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes
> \Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author (who might have been
> me, I forget) assumed that would imply all the earlier stages as well,
> but apparently it doesn't
On 12/07/2018 7:30 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:23 PM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 12/07/2018 6:33 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and
while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD
check issues a w
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:23 PM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>
> On 12/07/2018 6:33 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> > I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and
> > while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD
> > check issues a warning for it. (See below.)
> >
On 12/07/2018 6:33 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and
while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD
check issues a warning for it. (See below.)
Is it intentional that \Sexpr is not allowed at the top level? The Rd
gr
