### Re: [Rd] dotcode typo? (PR#7917)

On 6/2/2005 1:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whoops, spoke too soon. This definitely breaks the logic, so I won't commit. With this change the check of demo(lm.glm) in package utils fails with this error message: dead - cbind(x, n - x) summary(glm(dead ~ dose, family = binomial(link = logit))) Error in .Call(logit_link, mu) : cannot resolve native routine Execution halted I'm cc'ing this to R-bugs so we don't forget it, but I'm not going to be able to fix it down myself. Duncan Murdoch __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel That occurs in code that I recently added so I better check that. I think it was that .Call() didn't include PACKAGE=stats in stats/R/family.R. I've fixed that; I'll look for other similar cases. Duncan Murdoch __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

### [Rd] dotcode typo?

I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152 looks like a typo: here are lines 149-155 if(!*fun) { if(dll.type != FILENAME) { *fun = R_FindNativeSymbolFromDLL(buf, dll, symbol); if(!fun) { errorcall(call, cannot resolve native routine); } } and I think the if(!fun) should be if(!*fun). Reid Huntsinger __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

### RE: [Rd] dotcode typo?

Sorry, I was looking at 2.0.1 when I meant to be looking at 2.1.0. The line numbers for the latter are 161-179 and line 164 is the one with what I think is a typo. Reid Huntsinger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huntsinger, Reid Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 12:33 PM To: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [Rd] dotcode typo? I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152 looks like a typo: here are lines 149-155 if(!*fun) { if(dll.type != FILENAME) { *fun = R_FindNativeSymbolFromDLL(buf, dll, symbol); if(!fun) { errorcall(call, cannot resolve native routine); } } and I think the if(!fun) should be if(!*fun). Reid Huntsinger __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments,...{{dropped}} __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

### Re: [Rd] dotcode typo?

Huntsinger, Reid wrote: Sorry, I was looking at 2.0.1 when I meant to be looking at 2.1.0. The line numbers for the latter are 161-179 and line 164 is the one with what I think is a typo. Reid Huntsinger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huntsinger, Reid Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 12:33 PM To: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [Rd] dotcode typo? I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152 looks like a typo: here are lines 149-155 if(!*fun) { if(dll.type != FILENAME) { *fun = R_FindNativeSymbolFromDLL(buf, dll, symbol); if(!fun) { errorcall(call, cannot resolve native routine); } } and I think the if(!fun) should be if(!*fun). I think you're right about the typo. In the current code, !fun is known to be false, so the cannot resolve native routine error message is not even compiled in. Putting in !*fun means that .C(foo) produces cannot resolve native routine, rather than function name not in load table from the test a few lines down. I'll commit this change after testing, but I hope Duncan TL has time to look at it and make sure the logic is okay. Duncan Murdoch __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

### Re: [Rd] dotcode typo? (PR#7917)

Duncan Murdoch wrote: Huntsinger, Reid wrote: Sorry, I was looking at 2.0.1 when I meant to be looking at 2.1.0. The line numbers for the latter are 161-179 and line 164 is the one with what I think is a typo. Reid Huntsinger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huntsinger, Reid Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 12:33 PM To: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [Rd] dotcode typo? I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152 looks like a typo: here are lines 149-155 if(!*fun) { if(dll.type != FILENAME) { *fun = R_FindNativeSymbolFromDLL(buf, dll, symbol); if(!fun) { errorcall(call, cannot resolve native routine); } } and I think the if(!fun) should be if(!*fun). I think you're right about the typo. In the current code, !fun is known to be false, so the cannot resolve native routine error message is not even compiled in. Putting in !*fun means that .C(foo) produces cannot resolve native routine, rather than function name not in load table from the test a few lines down. I'll commit this change after testing, but I hope Duncan TL has time to look at it and make sure the logic is okay. Whoops, spoke too soon. This definitely breaks the logic, so I won't commit. With this change the check of demo(lm.glm) in package utils fails with this error message: dead - cbind(x, n - x) summary(glm(dead ~ dose, family = binomial(link = logit))) Error in .Call(logit_link, mu) : cannot resolve native routine Execution halted I'm cc'ing this to R-bugs so we don't forget it, but I'm not going to be able to fix it down myself. Duncan Murdoch __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

### Re: [Rd] dotcode typo? (PR#7917)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Duncan Murdoch wrote: Huntsinger, Reid wrote: Sorry, I was looking at 2.0.1 when I meant to be looking at 2.1.0. The line numbers for the latter are 161-179 and line 164 is the one with what I think is a typo. Reid Huntsinger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huntsinger, Reid Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 12:33 PM To: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [Rd] dotcode typo? I ran across the following in the R-2.0.1 source, src/main/dotcode.c, in the function resolveNativeRoutine(), lines 146-163. Line 152 looks like a typo: here are lines 149-155 if(!*fun) { if(dll.type != FILENAME) { *fun = R_FindNativeSymbolFromDLL(buf, dll, symbol); if(!fun) { errorcall(call, cannot resolve native routine); } } and I think the if(!fun) should be if(!*fun). I think you're right about the typo. In the current code, !fun is known to be false, so the cannot resolve native routine error message is not even compiled in. Putting in !*fun means that .C(foo) produces cannot resolve native routine, rather than function name not in load table from the test a few lines down. I'll commit this change after testing, but I hope Duncan TL has time to look at it and make sure the logic is okay. Whoops, spoke too soon. This definitely breaks the logic, so I won't commit. With this change the check of demo(lm.glm) in package utils fails with this error message: dead - cbind(x, n - x) summary(glm(dead ~ dose, family = binomial(link = logit))) Error in .Call(logit_link, mu) : cannot resolve native routine Execution halted I'm cc'ing this to R-bugs so we don't forget it, but I'm not going to be able to fix it down myself. Duncan Murdoch __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel That occurs in code that I recently added so I better check that. __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel