RE: [Rd] minus: operator and sign (PR#7908)

2005-05-31 Thread Ted Harding
On 31-May-05 Ted Harding wrote: > [...] > But it is always safe (and often prudent) to force precedence > with parentheses -- at least you yourself are then absolutely > sure of exactly what is going to happen, which is the really > important thing (and this is Rule 2, which takes precedence > over

RE: [Rd] minus: operator and sign (PR#7908)

2005-05-31 Thread Ted Harding
On 31-May-05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Allan Sims > Version: 2.1.0 > OS: WinXP > Submission from: (NULL) (193.40.25.254) > > > This should not be correct. It seams that first power is applied and > then sign. >> -2^2 > [1] -4 Rule 1: Know your enemy! ?Syntax --> The following

Re: [Rd] minus: operator and sign (PR#7908)

2005-05-31 Thread Uwe Ligges
Uwe Ligges wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Allan Sims Version: 2.1.0 OS: WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (193.40.25.254) This should not be correct. It seams that first power is applied and then sign. -2^2 [1] -4 __ R-devel@stat.ma

Re: [Rd] minus: operator and sign (PR#7908)

2005-05-31 Thread ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Allan Sims > Version: 2.1.0 > OS: WinXP > Submission from: (NULL) (193.40.25.254) > > > This should not be correct. It seams that first power is applied and then > sign. > >>-2^2 > > [1] -4 > > __ > R-devel@sta

[Rd] minus: operator and sign (PR#7908)

2005-05-31 Thread allsi
Full_Name: Allan Sims Version: 2.1.0 OS: WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (193.40.25.254) This should not be correct. It seams that first power is applied and then sign. > -2^2 [1] -4 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/