Hi Luigi
If you went down the relation = “free” road you could change the panel widths
to reflect the scales
eg if lhs was 1:200 and rhs was 1:100 then the lhs panel would be twice as wide
as the rhs.
I have some code reasonably handy I could send it to you if needed.
Regards
About my previous answer, I should have taken advantage of glm() in place of
lm(), as the response is binomial.
--
GG
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
Dear all,
I am trying to use neural networks to discriminate positive and
negative outcomes from a test; this outcome is given in the z variable
of the example I am providing. Each outcome is associated with a pair
of variables x and y and I was planning to identify the cut-offs that
could
I would tackle the problem in the following way:
lm.model <- lm(z~ x + y, data=m)
summary(lm.model)
Call:
lm(formula = z ~ x + y, data = m)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-0.34476713 -0.09571506 -0.01786731 0.05225554 0.51693389
Coefficients:
Hi
Your question posted in HTML is somewhat scrambled. Based on what I understand
from it, maybe you shall inspect ?merge.
Cheers
Petr
> -Original Message-
> From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Web Web
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 8:15 PM
> To:
On 12/19/2015 10:39 PM, Vinny Mo wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I used to use the "file.choose()" command quite a lot, as well as the "change
> working directory" drop down tab as part of my workflow with R, but for over
> 1 year both of these actions have caused the spinning-wheel to crash R (just
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
