Dear Group members
Can any one help to code this situation. Suppose we have a population with some
mean and a standard deviation. Then , there are n1 observations out of n
which are less than or equal to n. Also, there are n2 observations out of n
which are greater than . We divide the
There exists a fine line between being unintentionally rude, but helpful
and purposely putting someone down. -- H
On 25 January 2016 at 12:07, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 25/01/2016 2:45 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
>
>> I disagree, and would argue that fails to take a
On 25/01/2016 2:45 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
I disagree, and would argue that fails to take a systemic view of this
kind of behaviour.
If individual commentators are acerbic and are only privately
reprimanded, from the perspective of everyone else it looks like the
acerbic reply was A-OK. Someone
Two concerns with implementing this philosophy.
1. Determining whether a question is indeed seeking an answer to a
homework exercise. Certainly if I think a question is short-cutting a basic
homework task I ignore it. But I don't waste an email berating the alleged
student.
2.
+1. And frankly I would like to suggest that there is another obvious
solution here; pairing a set of guidelines around expected user
behaviour with removing people from the mailing list, or moderating
them, if they do not think that creating a non-toxic environment is
good.
On 25 January 2016 at
There is a function called `smda` in the sparseLDA package that implements
the model described in Clemmensen, L., Hastie, T., Witten, D. and Ersbøll,
B. Sparse discriminant analysis, Technometrics, 53(4): 406-413, 2011
Max
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:45 PM, TJUN KIAT TEO
I'm glad to see the issue of negative feedback addressed. I can especially
relate to the 'cringe' feeling when reading some authoritarian backhand to a
new user. We do see a number of obviously inappropriate or overly lazy
postings, but I encounter far more postings where I don't feel competent
My feelings exactly! (And since quite some time ago).
Ted.
On 25-Jan-2016 12:23:16 Fowler, Mark wrote:
> I'm glad to see the issue of negative feedback addressed. I can especially
> relate to the 'cringe' feeling when reading some authoritarian backhand to a
> new user. We do see a number of
On 25/01/2016 12:35 PM, John Sorkin wrote:
When we read acerbic replies we should remind the poster to reply in a more
moderate tone.
As long as you do this in private, not on the list, I wouldn't object.
(I'd hope I wouldn't even know about it.) Doing it on the list is more
likely to lead
When we read acerbic replies we should remind the poster to reply in a more
moderate tone. On the other hand noting that the list is not intended to be a
source of answers to home work questions is 100% appropriate. This philosophy
is intended both to keep the list from being flooded with
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:33:12 -0800
Hasan Diwan wrote:
> There exists a fine line between being unintentionally rude, but
> helpful and purposely putting someone down. -- H
The line is really not "fine" at all since it lies in that word
"purposely." Also, you've
On 25 January 2016 at 13:13, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 25/01/2016 3:33 PM, Hasan Diwan wrote:
>
>> There exists a fine line between being unintentionally rude, but helpful
>> and purposely putting someone down. -- H
>>
>
> I'm afraid I don't think your point is
Sorry, poor phrasing on my part; on the occasions where someone is
rude, all I see is...
I agree the public cautioning should be done by moderators, yes.
On 25 January 2016 at 16:13, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 25/01/2016 3:33 PM, Hasan Diwan wrote:
>>
>> There exists a
On 25/01/2016 3:33 PM, Hasan Diwan wrote:
There exists a fine line between being unintentionally rude, but helpful
and purposely putting someone down. -- H
I'm afraid I don't think your point is relevant. I didn't claim all the
people who were rude did it unintentionally. However, I don't
Do you have the sample sizes that the sample proportions were computed
from (e.g. 0.5 could be 1 out of 2 or 100 out of 200)?
If you do then you can specify the model with the proportions as the y
variable and the corresponding sample sizes as the weights argument to
glm.
If you only have
Muhammed:
1. Please post in plain text, not HTML, as HTML tends to get mangled
(this is the stated policy on this list). This may have happened to
your post, so I am not entirely sure what you want.
2. However, an assumption that you appear to be making is false: it is
not in general possible to
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:06:35 -0500
Oliver Keyes wrote:
> +1. And frankly I would like to suggest that there is another obvious
> solution here; pairing a set of guidelines around expected user
> behaviour with removing people from the mailing list, or moderating
> them, if
But beta can only be used to model the open interval between zero and one
On Monday, January 25, 2016, Greg Snow <538...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you have the sample sizes that the sample proportions were computed
> from (e.g. 0.5 could be 1 out of 2 or 100 out of 200)?
>
> If you do then you can
I think this would be re-defining the role of the moderators for list, which is
essentially to filter out spam. Only new members are subject to this
moderation, and if a message is genuine then their moderator flag is cleared
(i.e., they are no longer subject to moderation). Thus the list
I submit it is up to list members to maintain civility. If we politely point
out. off-line, to people who post questionable posts what they are doing, I am
sure their behavior will quickly change.John
John David Sorkin M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine
Chief, Biostatistics and Informatics
Estimados
Creo que ese problema es muy común, almacenar mal la información y darse cuenta
al tiempo de análisis. Es el problema que yo encontré cuándo comencé a ser
profesional y dejar mis tiempos de estudiante cuándo los ejemplos andan.
Mi respuesta va por dos lados:
El primero, no comprendo
I disagree, and would argue that fails to take a systemic view of this
kind of behaviour.
If individual commentators are acerbic and are only privately
reprimanded, from the perspective of everyone else it looks like the
acerbic reply was A-OK. Someone said something unnecessarily hostile
and the
Hi Muhammad,
There are a large number of approximate answers to your problem. One easy
one is to ensure that the standard deviations of the subgroups are
maximally different by dividing the observations into "mids" (observations
close to the mean) and "tails" (observations far from the mean). The
I'm finding it very difficult to figure out how to read the value of
"celltag" for a given cell in a tktable.
I'm sure it's something like:
tcl(classTable, "get", "celltag", row, column)
but of the dozens of variations of names, options, args, and formats I've
tried, nothing is working. Any
Hi all,
I am using Rstudio version 0.99.491. I am trying install "mapview" package.
install.packages("mapview")
I receive following error message
configure: error: Cannot compile a simple JNI program. See config.log for
details.
Make sure you have Java Development Kit installed and correctly
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 4:20 PM, Debasish Pai Mazumder wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am using Rstudio version 0.99.491. I am trying install "mapview" package.
> install.packages("mapview")
>
> I receive following error message
>
> configure: error: Cannot compile a simple JNI
> On 26 Jan 2016, at 00:54 , Dalthorp, Daniel wrote:
>
> I'm finding it very difficult to figure out how to read the value of
> "celltag" for a given cell in a tktable.
>
> I'm sure it's something like:
>
> tcl(classTable, "get", "celltag", row, column)
>
> but of the
On 01/25/2016 11:06 AM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
+1. And frankly I would like to suggest that there is another obvious
solution here; pairing a set of guidelines around expected user
behaviour with removing people from the mailing list, or moderating
them, if they do not think that creating a
Here is my sample code
TunePar<-matrix(list(Null),2,2)
TunePar[[1,1]]=list(subclasses=3,model="gen.ridge")
tune=paste(colnames(Temp),Temp,sep="=")
tune=paste(tune,collapse=",")
However when I type tune
This is what I get
"subclasses=3,model=1"
The text "gen.ridge has been converted to the
Thank you Joshua for your valuable help,
It just works fine now !
Regards, O.
Olivier ETERRADOSSI
Maître-Assistant HDR
Ingénierie de l’aspect visuel et tactile
C2MA – Pôle R.I.M.E. (site de Pau)
Ecole des mines d’Alès
Technopole Hélioparc
2 av. P. Angot
64053 PAU Cedex 9
France
-Message
Hi
What is Temp?
Just a guess. "model" variable is factor and it is converted to its numeric
representation during paste or any other operation you made.
Cheers
Petr
> -Original Message-
> From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of TJUN
> KIAT TEO
> Sent: Monday,
It's been so long that I have forgotten how to get the package with the table
widget installed on OSX, so I cannot check things for you. However, the
canonical way to handle %S type arguments is to pass them as formal arguments
to the callback, e.g.
> .Tcl.callback(function(x,y)x+y)
[1]
> On Jan 24, 2016, at 10:45 PM, Olivier Crouzet
> wrote:
>
> Hi, I think this page will help,
>
> https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/lower.tri.html
I agree that might be useful. Also very useful if the OP wants further advice
would be for
33 matches
Mail list logo