You could delete your 3.5 personal package library (using the File Explorer
with Run as Admin if necessary) and re-install your packages without running as
Admin. If that does not work try uninstalling R and re-installing 3.5.1.
On December 22, 2018 8:16:11 PM PST, Janh Anni wrote:
>This issue
It doesn't matter. The whole point is to make the pseudo-random sequence
repeatable... unless you have a specific reason to avoid repeatability.
On December 22, 2018 5:33:39 PM PST, Steven Yen wrote:
>I have known from the old days to set a random seed of a LARGE ODD
>NUMBER. Now I read instruc
This issue only came up after I installed R3.5.2. Never had any problems
with previous installations. So it is likely a bug in the current
version. Any suggestions what to do now?
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:06 PM Jeff Newmiller
wrote:
> That normally only occurs if you have at some time used e
That normally only occurs if you have at some time used elevated permissions,
beyond which point you fall into a downward spiral of more permissions trouble.
You are apparently already in trouble, whether it was of your own making or due
to a bug in the installer.
Also, never update the system
Hi Jeff,
No, during the installation, there was not an option to Run as
Administration. But *after *installation, I found that if I selected Run
as Administrator, then I could install packages using install.packages as
usual without problems.
Thanks
Janh
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:26 PM Jeff New
I have known from the old days to set a random seed of a LARGE ODD
NUMBER. Now I read instructions of set.seed and it requires ANY INTEGER.
Any idea? Or, does it matter. Thanks.
--
st...@ntu.edu.tw (S.T. Yen)
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
Did you by any chance use Run As Administrator to install R? If so then you
need to uninstall it and delete all files created by it (e.g.
Documents/R/win-lib/3.5/) and re-install using UAC as prompted.
On December 22, 2018 5:10:27 PM PST, Janh Anni wrote:
>Dear R Experts,
>
>I use Windows 10 an
Dear R Experts,
I use Windows 10 and just installed the new R version, R3.5.2 but when I
tried to load a data file using read.table, I got an error message like
this:
*Error in file(file, "rt") : cannot open the connection*
*In addition: Warning message:*
*In file(file, "rt") :*
* cannot open fi
... Moreover, you should not analyze proportions in this way, which treats
.5 = 2/4 or .5 = 2000/4000 identically. As David said, you need to work
with a statistician.
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Ber
You may need to spend some more time with the statistician who needs to see
your data. It is not clear if you have a two sample test or a paired sample
test. Kruskall-Wallis expects data for each observation, not grouped data.
Without the observations, the test cannot compute the sample size and
Thank you all - print works wonders.
On 12/22/2018 10:36 PM, Eric Berger wrote:
> Hi Steven,
> Here's one way, using print
>
> try5<-function(A,B){
> C<-A+B
> #cat("\nA =",A,"\nC = ",C)
> cat("\nA = ")
> print(A)
> cat("\nC = ")
> print(C)
> structure(list(A=A,B=B,C=C))
> }
>
> HTH,
Try using print instead of cat [1], and please read about what the arguments
are in the help file [2][3] for any function you are using before posting a
question.
[1]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31843662/what-is-the-difference-between-cat-and-print
[2] ?cat
[3] ?print
On December 22, 2
Hello,
Use print(A) and print(C). cat is meant for simpler objects.
Hope this helps,
Rui Barradas
Às 14:31 de 22/12/2018, Steven Yen escreveu:
How do I print a matrix running a procedure? In the code below, I print
with the cat command and get a vector (from A and C).
A<-matrix(rpois(16,lamb
Hi Steven,
Here's one way, using print
try5<-function(A,B){
C<-A+B
#cat("\nA =",A,"\nC = ",C)
cat("\nA = ")
print(A)
cat("\nC = ")
print(C)
structure(list(A=A,B=B,C=C))
}
HTH,
Eric
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 4:32 PM Steven Yen wrote:
> How do I print a matrix running a procedure? I
How do I print a matrix running a procedure? In the code below, I print
with the cat command and get a vector (from A and C).
A<-matrix(rpois(16,lambda=5),nrow=4,byrow=T)
B<-diag(4)
try5<-function(A,B){
C<-A+B
cat("\nA =",A,"\nC = ",C)
structure(list(A=A,B=B,C=C))
}
v<-try5(A,B)
v$C
--
st
Hi Michael,
Thank you for your reply! I'm testing the difference in proportions. Temp
is temperature, and Prop is the proportion of insect pupae that survived at
that temperature. I was told by a statistician that the K-W was appropriate
for testing proportions, but perhaps you know of an alternat
Dear Jenny
What exactly do you think you are testing here? You are telling K-W you
have seven groups each with a single value which is not the usual
situation for K-W.
Michael
On 22/12/2018 04:58, Jenny Liu wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been running a K-W test with the attached data, PupMort1.
Dear Giuseppe
If I understand you correctly you have a very large sample size so it is
not surprising that you get very small p-values. Eevn a scientifically
uninteresting difference can become statistically significant with large
samples. You probably need to define a metric for meaningful di
18 matches
Mail list logo
