Hi Saptarshi: There are quite a few parallel mapply's out there -- my recommendation is to use the foreach package, since it allows you to be flexible in the parallel backend, and you don't have to write two statements (a sequential and a parallel statement) -- if a parallel backend is running, it will use that, otherwise it'll execute in sequential mode.
--j ________________________________________ From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [r-help-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of Saptarshi Guha [saptarshi.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:24 PM To: R-help@r-project.org Subject: [R] Parallel version of Map(rather, mapply) Hello, I find Map to be nice interface to mapply. However Map calls mapply which in turn calls mapply via .Internal. Is there a parallel version of mapply (like mcapply) or do I need to write this myself? Regards Saptarshi [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.