Re: [R] debug vs regular mode

2012-08-10 Thread Zhang, Peng
If you read my bug report, I just ran the same thing on both regular mode and debug mode. That is why I think it is related with R base, though there might be some other bugs related with glmulti or rJava. Peng On 08/10/2012 04:03 PM, peter dalgaard wrote: > On Aug 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Zh

Re: [R] debug vs regular mode

2012-08-10 Thread Zhang, Peng
off-topic for R-help. If you > wish to continue the debugging process in public, I think you should move to > R-devel. > > Also, it sounds like the problem is in the glmulti package, so you might want > to involve its maintainer at some point. > > -pd > > On Aug 10, 2012

Re: [R] debug vs regular mode

2012-08-10 Thread Zhang, Peng
ength(names(call))+1]] = exma names(call)[length(names(call))] ="exclude" if (missing(data)) { call[[length(names(call))+1]] = environment(y) names(call)[length(names(call))] ="data" } eval(call) } debug(glmulti) glmulti(Y~(X1+X2+X3+X4+X5+X6+X7

Re: [R] debug vs regular mode

2012-08-10 Thread Zhang, Peng
graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base On 08/10/2012 09:25 AM, Henric (Nilsson) Winell wrote: > On 2012-08-10 06:10, Zhang, Peng wrote: > >> Thanks to both for your reply. >> >> library(glmulti) >> testdata = cbind(Y=rnorm(100), data.frame(matrix(rnorm(1

Re: [R] debug vs regular mode

2012-08-09 Thread Zhang, Peng
t 9:14 PM, David Winsemius wrote: > >> On Aug 9, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Zhang, Peng wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step >>> by step. >> >>> 2. Why does the same function b

[R] debug vs regular mode

2012-08-09 Thread Zhang, Peng
Dear all, I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step by step. When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have "segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time. My questions are