On Mar 19, 2011; 01:39am Andrzej Galecki wrote:
I agree with you that caution needs to be exercised. Simply because
mathematically the same
likelihood may be defined using different constant.
Yes. But this is ensured by the implementation. If the call to anova() is
made with the lm$obj first
Hello Thierry,
Based on the code below, it looks like you do not need to worry about
likelihoods from lm() and gls(). They are defined the same way. I agree
with you that caution needs to be exercised. Simply because
mathematically the same likelihood may be defined using different
2 matches
Mail list logo
