http://n4.nabble.com/file/n962784/egraph_rules_list_2.png The red X's that
are listed above represent data points that have been completely ignored in
production of my graph. I know that in a specified sentence length there are
variations in number of Conjunctions
--
View this message in
On Dec 12, 2009, at 7:32 PM, philip robinson wrote:
http://n4.nabble.com/file/n962784/egraph_rules_list_2.png The red
X's that
are listed above represent data points that have been completely
ignored in
production of my graph. I know that in a specified sentence length
there are
Sorry to have not provided enough information in my prior post. Here is a
summary of the calculation set that I am doing. The histograms have changed
since my last post, but I am not so concerned about them. The scatter plots
do not show all of the points, they seem to round off to the most
On Dec 13, 2009, at 6:06 PM, philip robinson wrote:
Sorry to have not provided enough information in my prior post. Here
is a
summary of the calculation set that I am doing. The histograms have
changed
since my last post, but I am not so concerned about them. The
scatter plots
do not
Thank you very much,
-- Philip
David Winsemius wrote:
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/help-with-graphing-Points-in-my-graph-are-not-apparent-always-displayed-in-steps-tp961629p963227.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Philip,
I must confess that I not understood what is the problem.
Could you clarify it a little bit more?
Cheers
miltinho
brazil=toronto
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:39 AM, philip robinson robin...@students.wwu.edu
wrote:
I am trying to graphically represent a large set of data who's
I am trying to graphically represent a large set of data who's result is not
strictly uniform. http://n4.nabble.com/file/n961629/egraph_rules_list_2.png
The scatter plot to the left has all of the data rising in steps however I
know that there are cases within my data that do not fit the dotted
7 matches
Mail list logo
