On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Hadley Wickham h.wick...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, November 5, 2012, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 06/11/12 09:40, Iurie Malai wrote:
So, R (as a language) can be viewed as an extended S language (S + some
improvements)? And the R environment includes this
In the Introduction and preliminaries the An Introduction to R manual
says about R: ... Among other things it has ... a well developed, simple
and effective programming language (Called 'S') ... . Now I'm a little
confused. This means that language S is a component part of R? And S is not
free?
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Iurie Malai iurie.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Introduction and preliminaries the An Introduction to R manual
says about R: ... Among other things it has ... a well developed, simple
and effective programming language (Called 'S') ... . Now I'm a little
Thanks all!
At least for me, the manual text has a contradiction. If R is much like S,
in other words it is a diverged S, as Michael says, it can't include
itself as a component part.
Regards,
Iurie
2012/11/5 R. Michael Weylandt michael.weyla...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM,
There is a bit of history in:
http://www.portfolioprobe.com/2012/05/31/inferno-ish-r/
Pat
On 05/11/2012 17:09, R. Michael Weylandt wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Iurie Malai iurie.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Introduction and preliminaries the An Introduction to R manual
says about
After reading the 'Inferno-ish R' the first thing that comes to mind is
that R is very much like S, but it's still different (R is not S), so it
can't contain the S as a programming language, as the manual says. Or I'm
wrong?
2012/11/5 Patrick Burns pbu...@pburns.seanet.com
There is a bit of
: Re: [R] A general question: Is language S a component part of R?
After reading the 'Inferno-ish R' the first thing that comes to mind is
that R is very much like S, but it's still different (R is not S), so it
can't contain the S as a programming language, as the manual says. Or I'm
wrong
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
On Behalf
Of Iurie Malai
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 11:38 AM
To: Patrick Burns
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] A general question: Is language S a component part of R?
After
On 06/11/12 09:40, Iurie Malai wrote:
So, R (as a language) can be viewed as an extended S language (S + some
improvements)? And the R environment includes this (extended) language +
extensions?
Are others getting as sick of this silly, pedantic and completely
irrelevant pseudo-scholasticism
On 05-11-2012, at 22:04, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 06/11/12 09:40, Iurie Malai wrote:
So, R (as a language) can be viewed as an extended S language (S + some
improvements)? And the R environment includes this (extended) language +
extensions?
Are others getting as sick of this silly, pedantic
On Nov 5, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Iurie Malai iurie.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks all!
At least for me, the manual text has a contradiction. If R is much like S,
in other words it is a diverged S, as Michael says, it can't include
itself as a component part.
I'd think something like C/C++ --
-bounces@r-
project.org] On Behalf Of R. Michael Weylandt
michael.weyla...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 3:48 PM
To: Iurie Malai
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] A general question: Is language S a component part of
R?
On Nov 5, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Iurie Malai iurie.ma
On Monday, November 5, 2012, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 06/11/12 09:40, Iurie Malai wrote:
So, R (as a language) can be viewed as an extended S language (S + some
improvements)? And the R environment includes this (extended) language +
extensions?
Are others getting as sick of this silly,
13 matches
Mail list logo
