Thanks Greg!
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 1:49 PM Greg Minshall wrote:
> by the way, and "fwiw", the emacs org mode community seems to like using
> latexmk for moving latex files towards .pdf'ishness:
>
> https://mg.readthedocs.io/latexmk.html
>
> cheers, Greg
>
>
by the way, and "fwiw", the emacs org mode community seems to like using
latexmk for moving latex files towards .pdf'ishness:
https://mg.readthedocs.io/latexmk.html
cheers, Greg
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 12:49:04 +0300
Eric Berger wrote:
As Achim wrote in point (2), Makefile is your friend.
Well, all I can say is that Makefile is *not* my friend; I have never
made its acquaintance and wouldn't know where to begin looking.
Would
It is a general "feature" of TeX that documents with tables of
contents, indices,
bibliographies, and so on, have to be "iterated to convergence". A couple of
PhD theses came out of Stanford; the problem is in that which page one thing
goes on depends on where other things went, which depends on
I can understand Rolf's concern. Make is a tool that is very helpful,
but also not trivial to learn how to make work. If a good Makefile
has been set up, then things are easy, but I've generally found my
skills limited to fairly simple Makefiles.
I would suggest that what is needed is a bit of
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 12:49:04 +0300
Eric Berger wrote:
> As Achim wrote in point (2), Makefile is your friend.
Well, all I can say is that Makefile is *not* my friend; I have never
made its acquaintance and wouldn't know where to begin looking.
Would it be possible for you to provide a
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:47:03 +0200
Achim Zeileis wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
I have found that tools::texi2pf() ignores changes to the *.bib file
unless the *.bbl file is removed prior to re-running
tools::texi2pdf().
This is
As Achim wrote in point (2), Makefile is your friend.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:39 PM Rolf Turner
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:47:03 +0200
> Achim Zeileis wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
> >
> > > I have found that tools::texi2pf() ignores changes to the *.bib file
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:47:03 +0200
Achim Zeileis wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> > I have found that tools::texi2pf() ignores changes to the *.bib file
> > unless the *.bbl file is removed prior to re-running
> > tools::texi2pdf().
>
> This is how texi2pdf (or actually
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
I have found that tools::texi2pf() ignores changes to the *.bib file
unless the *.bbl file is removed prior to re-running tools::texi2pdf().
This is how texi2pdf (or actually texi2dvi) from texinfo behaves. This is
likely what tools::texi2pdf calles in
I have found that tools::texi2pf() ignores changes to the *.bib file
unless the *.bbl file is removed prior to re-running tools::texi2pdf().
I have constructed a minimal reproducible example which is contained
in the attached file "mreprex.txt".
This *.txt file should be split into two files,
11 matches
Mail list logo
