Subject: Re: [R] Different LLRs on multinomial logit models in R and SPSS
On Jan 7, 2011, at 8:26 AM, sovo0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, David Winsemius wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Sören Vogel wrote:
Thanks for your replies. I am no mathematician or statistician by far
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, David Winsemius wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Sören Vogel wrote:
Thanks for your replies. I am no mathematician or statistician by far,
however, it appears to me that the actual value of any of the two LLs
is indeed important when it comes to calculation of
On Jan 7, 2011, at 8:26 AM, sovo0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, David Winsemius wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Sören Vogel wrote:
Thanks for your replies. I am no mathematician or statistician by
far,
however, it appears to me that the actual value of any of the two
LLs
Hello, after calculating a multinomial logit regression on my data, I
compared the output to an output retrieved with SPSS 18 (Mac). The
coefficients appear to be the same, but the logLik (and therefore fit)
values differ widely. Why?
The regression in R:
set.seed(1234)
df - data.frame(
On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Sören Vogel wrote:
Hello, after calculating a multinomial logit regression on my data, I
compared the output to an output retrieved with SPSS 18 (Mac). The
coefficients appear to be the same, but the logLik (and therefore fit)
values differ widely. Why?
The
Sören Vogel sovo0815 at gmail.com writes:
Hello, after calculating a multinomial logit regression on my data, I
compared the output to an output retrieved with SPSS 18 (Mac). The
coefficients appear to be the same, but the logLik (and therefore fit)
values differ widely. Why?
Since
Thanks for your replies. I am no mathematician or statistician by far,
however, it appears to me that the actual value of any of the two LLs
is indeed important when it comes to calculation of
Pseudo-R-Squared-s. If Rnagel devides by (some transformation of) the
actiual value of llnull then any
On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Sören Vogel wrote:
Thanks for your replies. I am no mathematician or statistician by far,
however, it appears to me that the actual value of any of the two LLs
is indeed important when it comes to calculation of
Pseudo-R-Squared-s. If Rnagel devides by (some
8 matches
Mail list logo
