On 03/21/2011 04:33 AM, Janko Thyson wrote:
...
Hi Janko,
As Dieter said, Crantastic is an opportunity for R users to give both
quickie ratings and reviews of packages. I have to say that doing a
review isn't trivial. I feel that I should use a package for a while
before I can review it, and
Dear List,
I'm aware that this has been brought up before (e.g.
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e6/help/09/03/7365.html
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e6/help/09/03/7365.html ;
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-March/190902.html
:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Feature-request-rating-review-system-for-R-packages-tp3391467p3391473.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do
Dieter Menne dieter.menne at menne-biomed.de writes:
After pondering all the pros and cons regarding the usefulness of a
rating/review system for R packages, don't you think it would make sense
to implement such a thing?
Or to look what is there, and how little it is filled:
It's unclear to me, why the rating/review system should relate to
entire packages. Would it not be more informative, if single specific
functions would be rated and reviewed?
I would like to see if + is rated better than -, or if more
difficulties are reported for * than for /. I could then
5 matches
Mail list logo
