[R] Filling in missing time samples with na.approx

2010-11-29 Thread Jason Edgecombe
Hi Everyone, I have a some data from a sports gps device like the following: time latitude longitude altitude distance heartrate 1 1277648884 0.304048 -0.793819 260 0.0094 2 1277648885 0.304056 -0.793772 262 4.30761595 3 127764 0.304060 -0.793696

Re: [R] Filling in missing time samples with na.approx

2010-11-29 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Jason Edgecombe ja...@rampaginggeek.com wrote: Hi Everyone, I have a some data from a sports gps device like the following:        time latitude longitude altitude  distance heartrate 1 1277648884 0.304048 -0.793819      260  0.00        94 2 1277648885

Re: [R] Filling in missing time samples with na.approx

2010-11-29 Thread Jason Edgecombe
On 11/29/2010 10:00 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Jason Edgecombe ja...@rampaginggeek.com wrote: Hi Everyone, I have a some data from a sports gps device like the following: time latitude longitude altitude distance heartrate 1 1277648884

Re: [R] Filling in missing time samples with na.approx

2010-11-29 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jason Edgecombe ja...@rampaginggeek.com wrote: On 11/29/2010 10:00 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Jason Edgecombe ja...@rampaginggeek.com  wrote: Hi Everyone, I have a some data from a sports gps device like the following:

Re: [R] Filling in missing time samples with na.approx

2010-11-29 Thread Felipe Carrillo
To: Jason Edgecombe ja...@rampaginggeek.com Cc: r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 10:51:07 AM Subject: Re: [R] Filling in missing time samples with na.approx On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jason Edgecombe ja...@rampaginggeek.com wrote: On 11/29/2010 10:00 AM, Gabor

Re: [R] Filling in missing time samples with na.approx

2010-11-29 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Felipe Carrillo mazatlanmex...@yahoo.com wrote: strange,,I don't see any change either, could it be that we have an older version of zoo? I am using the most recent one on CRAN which is zoo 1.6.4: packageDescription(zoo)$Version [1] 1.6-4 -- Statistics