Re: [R] How set lm() to don't return NA in summary()?

2011-08-06 Thread peter dalgaard
On Aug 6, 2011, at 03:23 , Walmes Zeviani wrote: Hi, I've data from an incomplete fatorial design. One level of a factor doesn't has the levels of the other. When I use lm(), the summary() return NA for that non estimable parameters. Ok, I understant it. But I use contrast::contrast(),

[R] How set lm() to don't return NA in summary()?

2011-08-05 Thread Walmes Zeviani
Hi, I've data from an incomplete fatorial design. One level of a factor doesn't has the levels of the other. When I use lm(), the summary() return NA for that non estimable parameters. Ok, I understant it. But I use contrast::contrast(), gmodels::estimable(), multcomp::glht() and all these fail