Tom La Bone wrote:
> I understand that the hat matrix is a function of the predictor variable
> alone. So, in the following example why do the values on the diagonal of the
> hat matrix change when I go from an unweighted fit to a weighted fit? Is the
> function hatvalues giving me something other
Because it does. I should have looked ahead a few chapters in the book
before I asked the question. However, I can't seem to reproduce the values
of the hat matrix given by R for the weighted fit example I gave. Any
suggestions (other than looking ahead a few more chapters)?
Tom
[[
I understand that the hat matrix is a function of the predictor variable
alone. So, in the following example why do the values on the diagonal of the
hat matrix change when I go from an unweighted fit to a weighted fit? Is the
function hatvalues giving me something other than what I think it is?
3 matches
Mail list logo