Try SciViews-K, an extension for Komodo Edit to transform it into a R
editor and GUI.
http://www.sciviews.org/SciViews-K/index.html
On 2010-8-2 23:35, alphaace wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I recently have started using R again on a Linux box after spending several
years on a Mac. Last I checked, the
Hi Everyone,
I recently have started using R again on a Linux box after spending several
years on a Mac. Last I checked, the best way to use R was through EMACS
using something like ESS. I remember that being serviceable but not always
the most convenient.
Is there anything comparable to the
Is there anything comparable to the mac version of R with its built in
console, editor, etc??
Aside from ESS/EMACS, you might try JGR, Tinn-R and Eclipse with StatET.
The later has the most features and is the best IDE, and we're in the
process of migrating to it from Tinn-R.
cur
--
Curt
Hi,
I recently have started using R again on a Linux box after spending several
years on a Mac. Last I checked, the best way to use R was through EMACS
using something like ESS. I remember that being serviceable but not always
the most convenient.
Is there anything comparable to the mac
[shameless plug]
I use TeXmacs with R. You can have R in a session. And you can even insert
graphs into your session.
http://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/plugins/statistics.en.html#r
(But then, I wrote the interface between R and TeXmacs)
Michael
--
View this message in context:
), though I wish it were.
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
On Behalf Of seeliger.c...@epamail.epa.gov
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 11:49 AM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Linux Editor
Is there anything comparable
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 08:48:54 -0700
seeliger.c...@epamail.epa.gov wrote:
Is there anything comparable to the mac version of R with its built
in console, editor, etc??
Aside from ESS/EMACS, you might try JGR, Tinn-R and Eclipse with
StatET. The later has the most features and is the best IDE,
In addition, there is SciViews for Komodo edit
http://www.sciviews.org/SciViews-K/
Joe
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:35 AM, alphaace rsa...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I recently have started using R again on a Linux box after spending several
years on a Mac. Last I checked, the best way
Michael,
Does TexMacs works with the latest R?
Shige
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Michael Lachmann lachm...@eva.mpg.de wrote:
[shameless plug]
I use TeXmacs with R. You can have R in a session. And you can even insert
graphs into your session.
alphaace rsaber at comcast.net writes:
Hi Everyone,
I recently have started using R again on a Linux box after spending several
years on a Mac. Last I checked, the best way to use R was through EMACS
using something like ESS. I remember that being serviceable but not always
the most
In general, yes. I work with it all the time, with the latest R (2.11.1)
However, I am using an older version of TeXmacs - 1.0.7.2, working
with the X11 interface.
When I try a newer version, 1.0.7.3 compiled with the QT interface on
OSX, and 1.0.7.4, I seem to have problems. I'm still not
Dear Michael,
Thanks for the effort. I am running 64-bit Ubuntu Linux.
Shige
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Michael Lachmann lachm...@eva.mpg.de wrote:
In general, yes. I work with it all the time, with the latest R (2.11.1)
However, I am using an older version of TeXmacs - 1.0.7.2, working
Dear Christian,
maybe the Eclipse plug-in for R http://www.walware.de/goto/statet is ok for
you. I have recently looked at it more closely and find it pretty good. It only
lacks an outline and symbolic debugging (besides profiling) to be close to
perfect.
There are plug-ins for many other
is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R
process within emacs is way much slower than in a regular terminal/
console?
It's just you, and if you think some more about it, you'll see
why we are all grinning. [ Hint: it can't be slower, outside of
ridiculous corner
On 10/9/07, Scionforbai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R
process within emacs is way much slower than in a regular terminal/
console?
It's just you, and if you think some more about it, you'll see
why we are all grinning. [ Hint:
Christian Salas wrote:
Using Tinn-R (in windows) is possible to run latex and R from the same
editor, which was great. Now, I am using Ubuntu-linux, which has been
better than WinXP. Currently, I am using Emacs (and then install ESS)
for running LaTeX and R from a same editor-program (like
just wanted to point out that this could explain the
reported slowness.
-Deepayan
Best regards
Frede
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: lø 06-10-2007 23:10
Til: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Emne: Re: [R] Linux
On Sat, 06-Oct-2007 at 11:01AM +0200, Scionforbai wrote:
| Hi,
|
| What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are
| these ESS features or LaTeX related features?
|
| is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R process
| within emacs is way much slower
Have you ever considered using C-u C-c C-r instead of C-c C-r?
Best regards
Frede
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: lø 06-10-2007 23:10
Til: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Emne: Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX
that this could explain the
reported slowness.
-Deepayan
Best regards
Frede
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: lø 06-10-2007 23:10
Til: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Emne: Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs
On 6 October 2007 at 11:01, Scionforbai wrote:
| What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are
| these ESS features or LaTeX related features?
|
| is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R process
| within emacs is way much slower than in a regular
On 10/6/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6 October 2007 at 11:01, Scionforbai wrote:
| What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are
| these ESS features or LaTeX related features?
|
| is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 13:42 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 6 October 2007 at 11:01, Scionforbai wrote:
| What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are
| these ESS features or LaTeX related features?
|
| is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running
hey dylan,
but i am looking for only one editor that is able to run R and also be
able to compile Latex files (like Emacs but i don't like too much emacs)
---
Christian SalasE-mail:[EMAIL
hi ScionForbai
yes i know auctex, but i do not know Kate, as I mentioned, I compile
LatEx documents from Emacs and also run R from it (thanks to ESS).
Regarding this that you said
in the built-in terminal on the lower part of the screen. I use the
mouse to copy/paste lines from a script to
I was wondering if you know of a linux editor that is able to run R and
compile LaTeX files from it.
I assume you already know auctex for emacs.
Well, currently I use emacs+auctex for latex and kate for R. ess
doesn't satisfy me, and I find R processes much slower when launched
within emacs.
Christian Salas wrote:
I want something like Emacs (of course including auctex and ess), but
not Emacs. Something like Tinn-R [http://www.sciviews.org/Tinn-R/] is
the best solution, as far as I know for it, unfortunately is only
available for Windows.
XEmacs? :-)
If you don't want Emacs,
On 10/5/07, Christian Salas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if you know of a linux editor that is able to run R and
compile LaTeX files from it.
Well, there is Winefish for LaTeX and Bluefish for R. The former is
based on the latter. Not exactly one editor, but you may be interested
in
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 22:09 +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On 10/5/07, Christian Salas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if you know of a linux editor that is able to run R and
compile LaTeX files from it.
Well, there is Winefish for LaTeX and Bluefish for R. The former is
based on
On 2007-October-05 , at 18:56 , Christian Salas wrote:
Using Tinn-R (in windows) is possible to run latex and R from the same
editor, which was great. Now, I am using Ubuntu-linux, which has been
better than WinXP. Currently, I am using Emacs (and then install ESS)
for running LaTeX and R
What are your criteria for friendliness? What features are you missing in
emacs
that you wish were there? Are these ESS features or LaTeX related features?
Rich
-Original Message-
want something like Emacs (of course including auctex and ess), but
not Emacs. Something like Tinn-R
31 matches
Mail list logo
