ve to write `log.foo`, but I'd need to add my own
>`foo` methods for the Math and Ops groups. Using a different class
>system might be a better solution, but my preference would definitely
>be for the base functions to coerce the class to numeric (which it
>indeed does if there are not
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
> I think you may be confusing (S3) class and ?mode.
Your point is well made, but to be precise, I think you should talk
about the "type of" an object, not it's mode. mode() is a wrapper
around typeof(), designed (I
on, but my preference would definitely be for the base functions
to coerce the class to numeric (which it indeed does if there are not multiple
classes).
Cole
________________
From: Bert Gunter [bgunter.4...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 4:45 PM
To: Beck, Cole
Cc:
I think you may be confusing (S3) class and ?mode.
> x <- seq.int(1:3)
> class(x)
[1] "integer"
> mode(x)
[1] "numeric"
> class(x+.5) ## coercion
[1] "numeric"
> mode(x+.5)
[1] "numeric"
But note:
> y <- as.integer(1)
> class(y)
[1] "integer"
> class(y) <- "foo"
> mode(y)
[1] "numeric"
>
I would expect that several math operations should always return values
with a class of numeric. If the input is defined with multiple classes,
however, the class attribute is preserved. I would think this may have
some unintended side-effects. Here's an example:
>
5 matches
Mail list logo