i am analyzing some data and have a question i hope someone can
answer.
i want to use this sort of model:
lmer( y ~ x + (1 | ID ), family=binomial, weight=w)
so i want to explore the relationship between y and x, with a random
effect for each patient.
my question is this. is this a sensible
Wiggin wiggin.peters at gmail.com writes:
i am analyzing some data and have a question i hope someone can
answer.
i want to use this sort of model:
[quoting snipped to fool gmane into letting me post a short answer]
lmer( y ~ x + (1 | ID ), family=binomial, weight=w)
so i want to
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Rolf Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I continue to struggle with mixed models. The square zero version
of the problem that I am trying to deal with is as follows:
A number (240) of students are measured (tested; for reading comprehension)
on 6 separate
Thanks for the response. I ***think*** I'm making a bit of
progress
On 29/07/2008, at 10:14 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Rolf Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What I *don't* understand is the correlation structure of the
estimates
I continue to struggle with mixed models. The square zero version
of the problem that I am trying to deal with is as follows:
A number (240) of students are measured (tested; for reading
comprehension)
on 6 separate occasions. Initially (square zero) I want to treat the
test time as a
5 matches
Mail list logo