Thank you for your comment. I suspected that a model with well defined
predictors should work fine with a glm procedure.
Thanks again
K
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Partial-Likelihood-tp4639159p4639185.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.
Joshua Wiley gmail.com> writes:
>
> In addition to Bert's suggestion of r sig mixed models
> (which I second), I would encourage you to create a
> more detailed example and explanation of what you hope to accomplish.
> Sounds a bit like an auto regressive
> structure, but more details would be
In addition to Bert's suggestion of r sig mixed models (which I second), I
would encourage you to create a more detailed example and explanation of what
you hope to accomplish. Sounds a bit like an auto regressive structure, but
more details would be good.
Cheers,
Josh
On Aug 4, 2012, at 9:34
Sounds like generalized linear mixed modeling (glmm) to me. Try
posting to the r-sig-mixed-models list rather than here to increase
the likelihood of a useful response.
-- Bert
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:55 AM, doctoratza wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> i would like to ask if everyone knows how to pe
Hello everyone,
i would like to ask if everyone knows how to perfom a glm partial likelihood
estimation in a time series whrere dependence exists.
lets say that i want to perform a logistic regression for binary data (0, 1)
with binary responses which a re the previous days.
for example:
logis
Hello,
I would like to get the partial likelihood device.
fit <- coxph(Surv(stop,event)~rx+size+number,data=bladder)
Does fit$loglik give the partial likelihood device?
Many thanks,
Dunia
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-proj
6 matches
Mail list logo