Re: [R] R, clinical trials and the FDA

2009-01-15 Thread David M Smith
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Kingsford Jones kingsfordjo...@gmail.com wrote: I hope that Marc doesn't mind, but I felt that part of his recent post was important enough to deserve it's own subject line rather then being lost in a 60-msg-long thread... I also wanted to thank Marc for this

Re: [R] R, clinical trials and the FDA

2009-01-15 Thread Marc Schwartz
on 01/15/2009 11:42 AM David M Smith wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Kingsford Jones kingsfordjo...@gmail.com wrote: I hope that Marc doesn't mind, but I felt that part of his recent post was important enough to deserve it's own subject line rather then being lost in a 60-msg-long

[R] R, clinical trials and the FDA

2009-01-11 Thread Kingsford Jones
I hope that Marc doesn't mind, but I felt that part of his recent post was important enough to deserve it's own subject line rather then being lost in a 60-msg-long thread... On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Marc Schwartz marc_schwa...@comcast.net wrote: ... I strongly believe that the

Re: [R] R, clinical trials and the FDA

2009-01-11 Thread Marc Schwartz
I don't mind at all. Very kind of you Kingsford. Thanks, Marc on 01/11/2009 01:05 PM Kingsford Jones wrote: I hope that Marc doesn't mind, but I felt that part of his recent post was important enough to deserve it's own subject line rather then being lost in a 60-msg-long thread...