Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-12-04 Thread Patrick Connolly
On Sun, 02-Dec-2007 at 11:20PM +, S Ellison wrote: | Package review is a nice idea. But you raise a worrying point. | Are any of the 'downright dangerous' packages on CRAN? Don't know about dangerous, but I would like the opportunity to provide feedback or to have seen feedback from others

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-12-04 Thread Ben Bolker
S Ellison wrote: Package review is a nice idea. But you raise a worrying point. Are any of the 'downright dangerous' packages on CRAN? If so, er... why? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/01/07 7:21 AM I think the need for this is rather urgent, in fact. Most packages are very good, but I regret

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-12-04 Thread Ben Bolker
John Sorkin wrote: I believe we need to know the following about packages: (1) Does the package do what it purports to do, i.e. are the results valid? (2) Have the results generated by the package been validate against some other statistical package, or hand-worked example? (3) Are the

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-12-03 Thread Pablo G Goicoechea
7700 [2]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [3]http://www.cmis.csiro.au/bill.venables/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[5]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doran, Harold Sent: Saturday, 1 December 2007 6:13 AM To: R Help Subject: [R] Rating R Helpers Since R is open source and help

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-12-03 Thread Mike Prager
John Sorkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe we need to know the following about packages: (1) Does the package do what it purports to do, i.e. are the results valid? (2) Have the results generated by the package been validate against some other statistical package, or hand-worked example?

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-12-01 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Dec 1, 2007 2:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To me a much more urgent initiative is some kind of user online review system for packages, even something as simple as that used by Amazon.com has for customer review of books. I think the need for this is rather urgent, in fact. Most

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-12-01 Thread Mark Kimpel
To: R Help Subject: [R] Rating R Helpers Since R is open source and help may come from varied levels of experience on R-Help, I wonder if it might be helpful to construct a method that can be used to rate those who provide help on this list. This is something that is done on other comp lists

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-12-01 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
: +61 7 3286 7700 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cmis.csiro.au/bill.venables/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doran, Harold Sent: Saturday, 1 December 2007 6:13 AM To: R Help Subject: [R] Rating R Helpers

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-12-01 Thread Johannes Hüsing
Mark Kimpel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 05:28:28PM CET]: What I would find useful would be some sort of tagging system for messages. Hrm. I find tags immensely useful for entities which do not contain primarily text, such as photos. I am at doubt how keywords are important when they

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-11-30 Thread Matthew Keller
On Nov 30, 2007 1:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Doran, Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007/11/30 Fri PM 02:12:36 CST To: R Help [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [R] Rating R Helpers Of course, it's just MHO, but I think your suggestion is more work than neccesary because it becomes

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-11-30 Thread Max
Maybe I haven't been on the list long enough, but how bad is the R advice on this list? Is a rating system even necessary? As Mark Leeds pointed out, there is the issue that what a beginner thinks is good advice isn't what an expert thinks in good advice. There is also the converse, expert

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-11-30 Thread markleeds
From: Doran, Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007/11/30 Fri PM 02:12:36 CST To: R Help [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [R] Rating R Helpers Of course, it's just MHO, but I think your suggestion is more work than neccesary because it becomes pretty obvious who the R-experts are once you've been

[R] Rating R Helpers

2007-11-30 Thread Doran, Harold
Since R is open source and help may come from varied levels of experience on R-Help, I wonder if it might be helpful to construct a method that can be used to rate those who provide help on this list. This is something that is done on other comp lists, like http://www.experts-exchange.com/. I

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-11-30 Thread hadley wickham
A nice model might be http://www.workingwithrails.com/. It also suggests other possible measures of authority: * member of R core * packages written by/contributed to * R conference attended/presented at * contributer to wiki Hadley On 11/30/07, Doran, Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-11-30 Thread Frank E Harrell Jr
Doran, Harold wrote: Since R is open source and help may come from varied levels of experience on R-Help, I wonder if it might be helpful to construct a method that can be used to rate those who provide help on this list. This is something that is done on other comp lists, like

Re: [R] Rating R Helpers

2007-11-30 Thread Bill.Venables
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doran, Harold Sent: Saturday, 1 December 2007 6:13 AM To: R Help Subject: [R] Rating R Helpers Since R is open source and help may come from varied levels of experience on R-Help, I wonder if it might be helpful to construct a method that can be used