Bendix,
you can also take a source package an run
R CMD Rd2dvi --no-clean packageName
on it and you will get a temporary directory with the TeX sources in it.
Best wishes,
Uwe
BXC (Bendix Carstensen) wrote:
In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave the file
G'day Uwe,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:43 +0200
Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de wrote:
you can also take a source package an run
R CMD Rd2dvi --no-clean packageName
on it and you will get a temporary directory with the TeX sources in
it.
Which is fine for manual processing and
Berwin A Turlach wrote:
G'day Uwe,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:43 +0200
Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de wrote:
you can also take a source package an run
R CMD Rd2dvi --no-clean packageName
on it and you will get a temporary directory with the TeX sources in
it.
Which is fine
G'day Bendix,
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:52:02 +0200
BXC (Bendix Carstensen) b...@steno.dk wrote:
In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave
the file foo-manual.tex in the folder foo.Rcheck.
But as of 2.9.0 only foo-manual.pdf and foo-manual.log are there.
Is this
In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave the file
foo-manual.tex in the folder foo.Rcheck.
But as of 2.9.0 only foo-manual.pdf and foo-manual.log are there.
Is this intentional?
Anyway it is inconvenient, because I would occasionally like to include the
manual at the
5 matches
Mail list logo