Re: [R] Think I'm sure, but confirm: lme4 vs. nlme

2008-10-22 Thread Bert Gunter
x27;m sure, but confirm: lme4 vs. nlme The impression I get from the list and the references I've perused is that nlme is being phased out in favor of lme4, but lme4 still doesn't have a complete feature set yet. -- Not exactly. nlme isn't really being phased out (yet anyway) --

Re: [R] Think I'm sure, but confirm: lme4 vs. nlme

2008-10-22 Thread Mitchell Maltenfort
authority of course, but perhaps a couple of quick inline > comments may suffice: > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mitchell Maltenfort > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 7:41 AM > To: r-help@r-project.org > Sub

[R] Think I'm sure, but confirm: lme4 vs. nlme

2008-10-22 Thread Mitchell Maltenfort
The impression I get from the list and the references I've perused is that nlme is being phased out in favor of lme4, but lme4 still doesn't have a complete feature set yet. What I'm still fuzzy on, being a relative R newbie, is: (a) what features in nlme are currently missing in lme4 (b) what's