Thanks to both of you, you are probably right that memory is the limiting
factor. I have no knowledge about the available memory on the lab machines,
but I will find out and make sure that this is the explanation.
Best,
Ulrike
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Two-R
lto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Ulrike Grömping
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:55 AM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] Two R sessions on multicore computer seem to inhibit each other ?
Dear R-helpers,
I am puzzled by the following observation:
On my home dual core Windows desktop co
what would be nice is to understand the amount of cpu time vs. the elapsed time
consumed. you might be paging if you don't have sufficient real memory. I
would venture a guess that the cpu time is very similar and the differnce is
elapsed time due to some contention like memory.
Sent from my
P.S.: I should have mentioned: The operating system is Windows XP.
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Two-R-sessions-on-multicore-computer-seem-to-inhibit-each-other-tp4636336p4636355.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Dear R-helpers,
I am puzzled by the following observation:
On my home dual core Windows desktop computer, I am used to running two R
sessions in parallel. These do very well in using the full CPU of the
computer (half each) and don't seem to slow each other down.
Today I have started some large
5 matches
Mail list logo