Re: [R] dispcrepancy between aov F test and tukey contrasts results with mixed effects model

lba...@montana.edu wrote: Hello, I have some conflicting output from an aov summary and tukey contrasts with a mixed effects model I was hoping someone could clarify. I am comparing the abundance of a species across three willow stand types. Since I have 2 or 3 sites within a habitat I have

Re: [R] dispcrepancy between aov F test and tukey contrasts results with mixed effects model

Thanks Peter for the advice and quick response. I just want to clarify what you suggest. I should average values within a site then do a one-way anova to test for differnces between sites based on the 2 to 3 new samples per stand type -- and not use random effects for site? Or, because I've

Re: [R] dispcrepancy between aov F test and tukey contrasts results with mixed effects model

lba...@montana.edu wrote: Thanks Peter for the advice and quick response. I just want to clarify what you suggest. I should average values within a site then do a one-way anova to test for differnces between sites based on the 2 to 3 new samples per stand type -- and not use random effects for