him about the survey package.
-Original Message-
From: peter dalgaard [mailto:pda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 25 May 2012 9:37p
To: ilai
Cc: Steve Taylor; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] glm(weights) and standard errors
Weighting can be confusing: There are three standard forms of
gestion is the same as one of mine, and doesn't do what
>> I'm looking for.
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: David Winsemius [mailto:dwinsem...@comcast.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2012 3:37p
>> To: Steve Taylor
>> Cc: r-help
rrected) suggestion is the same as one of mine, and doesn't do what
> I'm looking for.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Winsemius [mailto:dwinsem...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2012 3:37p
> To: Steve Taylor
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> S
2 3:37p
To: Steve Taylor
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] glm(weights) and standard errors
On May 21, 2012, at 10:58 PM, Steve Taylor wrote:
> Is there a way to tell glm() that rows in the data represent a certain
> number of observations other than one? Perhaps even fractional
>
On May 21, 2012, at 10:58 PM, Steve Taylor wrote:
Is there a way to tell glm() that rows in the data represent a
certain number of observations other than one? Perhaps even
fractional values?
Using the weights argument has no effect on the standard errors.
Compare the following; is the
Is there a way to tell glm() that rows in the data represent a certain number
of observations other than one? Perhaps even fractional values?
Using the weights argument has no effect on the standard errors. Compare the
following; is there a way to get the first and last models to produce the s
6 matches
Mail list logo
