Hi Peter,
thanks a lot for your help. Very much appreciated.
Cheers,
Julia
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>
> Julia S. wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> thanks for your help. I did read Bates statement several times, and I am
>> very glad and thankful that many statisticians spend much time on this.
>> The
On 9/10/2008, at 12:34 AM, Julia S. wrote:
Hm.
Bert Gunter wrote:
that even the most technical
aspects of the discipline can be made manifest to anyone with half
a brain
and a stat 101 course under their belt.
I don't think this is something I can use in a rebuttal. The
reviewer may
Julia S. wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> thanks for your help. I did read Bates statement several times, and I am
> very glad and thankful that many statisticians spend much time on this. The
> problem is, as Dieter pointed it out, that many "end users" often have to
> use statistics without being able to f
Hi there,
thanks for your help. I did read Bates statement several times, and I am
very glad and thankful that many statisticians spend much time on this. The
problem is, as Dieter pointed it out, that many "end users" often have to
use statistics without being able to fully understand the math
Hm.
Bert Gunter wrote:
>
> that even the most technical
> aspects of the discipline can be made manifest to anyone with half a brain
> and a stat 101 course under their belt.
>
>
I don't think this is something I can use in a rebuttal. The reviewer may be
offended and reviewers are people one
Bert Gunter gene.com> writes:
> I think we owe Doug Bates a little more respect than that!
If you check my postings on the forum and on my homepage (subject: Gastric
Emptying), you will find that there are few people that pay so much respect to
Douglas Bates' contributions than I do.
I noted th
>> Well, writing on my rebuttal, I find myself being unable to explain in a
>> few, easy to understand (and, at the same time, correct) sentences
stating
>> that it is not a good idea to report (most likely wrong) dfs and F
>> statistics.
Without pretending to be able to discuss the details, may
You may find this site useful:
http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/bib/lme4bib.html
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Dieter Menne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julia S. gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Now, I did that in my article and I got a response from a reviewer that I
>> additionally should give the
Julia S. gmail.com> writes:
> Now, I did that in my article and I got a response from a reviewer that I
> additionally should give the degrees of freedom, and the F-statistics. From
> what I read here, that would be incorrect to do, and I sort of intuitively
> also understand why (at least I thin
Dear R-users,
I did do a thorough search and read many articles and forum threads on the
lme and lmer methods and their pitfalls and problems. I, being not a good
statistician but a mere "user", came to the conclusion that the most correct
form of reporting statistics for a mixed linear model wou
10 matches
Mail list logo